APITX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Yorktown Growth Fund (APITX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
APITX is managed by Yorktown Funds. It was launched on Jun 13, 1985. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
APITX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
APITX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APITX Yorktown Growth Fund | -4.73% | 10.90% | 7.34% | 19.37% | -26.74% | 16.38% | 28.59% | 30.52% | -14.66% | 26.20% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.53% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APITX achieves a -4.73% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 9.53% return. Over the past 10 years, APITX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 8.14%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
APITX
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- -4.73%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- 15.18%
- 3Y*
- 8.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.02%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
APITX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
APITX has a 2.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
APITX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
APITX
FGIAX
APITX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yorktown Growth Fund (APITX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APITX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 1.75 | -1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.04 | 2.26 | -1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 2.61 | -1.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 12.12 | -8.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APITX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 1.75 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.80 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.58 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.42 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between APITX and FGIAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
APITX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
APITX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.12%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APITX Yorktown Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.81% | 13.95% | 9.40% | 25.45% | 7.74% | 1.09% | 3.16% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.12% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
APITX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APITX drawdown since its inception was -63.33%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APITX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| APITX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.33% | -49.35% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.88% | -8.29% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.69% | -21.08% | -14.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.69% | -38.02% | +2.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.76% | -3.78% | -7.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.49% | -7.22% | -7.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 1.78% | +1.69% |
Volatility
APITX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Yorktown Growth Fund (APITX) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.05%. This indicates that APITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| APITX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 4.05% | +4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.34% | 7.09% | +8.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.33% | 12.28% | +11.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 13.08% | +7.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.80% | 15.17% | +3.63% |