PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APIE vs. MMKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APIE vs. MMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive International Equity ETF (APIE) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APIE achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly higher than MMKT's 1.62% return.


APIE

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.45%
YTD
9.17%
6M
9.79%
1Y
26.18%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
10Y*

MMKT

1D
0.01%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.73%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APIE vs. MMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
APIE
ActivePassive International Equity ETF
9.17%31.46%-5.42%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
1.62%4.13%1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between APIE and MMKT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024

-0.04

The correlation between APIE and MMKT shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APIE vs. MMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APIE
APIE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
APIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
APIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
APIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
APIE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APIE vs. MMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive International Equity ETF (APIE) and Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


APIEMMKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-15.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-60.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

15.54

-14.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

152.72

-150.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

913.70

-905.96

APIE vs. MMKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APIE Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the MMKT Sharpe Ratio of 16.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APIE and MMKT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

APIE vs. MMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APIE drawdown since its inception was -15.94%, which is greater than MMKT's maximum drawdown of -0.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APIE and MMKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APIEMMKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.94%

-0.04%

-15.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-0.02%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

0.00%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-0.00%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

0.00%

+3.39%

Volatility

APIE vs. MMKT - Volatility Comparison

ActivePassive International Equity ETF (APIE) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) at 0.05%. This indicates that APIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APIEMMKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

0.05%

+5.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

0.13%

+13.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

0.23%

+16.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.94%

0.23%

+16.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

0.23%

+16.71%

APIE vs. MMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

APIE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than MMKT's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

APIE vs. MMKT - Dividend Comparison

APIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than MMKT's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
APIE
ActivePassive International Equity ETF
3.40%3.71%2.14%0.63%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.71%3.98%1.07%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


APIE and MMKT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APIE has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to MMKT (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APIE dropped -15.94% vs MMKT's -0.04%.

On 1-year performance, APIE leads with 26.18% vs 3.79% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, APIE has performed better with a 26.18% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for APIE.

MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 3.40% for APIE.

APIE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MMKT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and Texas Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for APIE and 0.20% for MMKT.

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.76 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APIE and MMKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer