PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APHKX vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APHKX vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan International Value Fund (APHKX) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with APHKX having a 9.99% return and NEM slightly higher at 10.14%. Over the past 10 years, APHKX has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of 10.90%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.74% annualized return.


APHKX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.76%
YTD
9.99%
6M
13.96%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
16.73%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
10.90%

NEM

1D
1.21%
1M
1.05%
YTD
10.14%
6M
21.55%
1Y
99.11%
3Y*
40.60%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
14.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APHKX vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APHKX
Artisan International Value Fund
9.99%22.84%6.64%22.95%-6.78%16.94%8.81%24.22%-15.48%24.09%
NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corporation
10.14%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between APHKX and NEM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2006

0.26

The correlation between APHKX and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (10 years) to 0.36 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APHKX vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APHKX
APHKX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
APHKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APHKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
APHKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
APHKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
APHKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APHKX vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan International Value Fund (APHKX) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APHKXNEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

2.16

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

2.43

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

4.03

-1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.85

11.12

-3.28

APHKX vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APHKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APHKX and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APHKXNEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.16

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.33

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.42

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.13

+0.31

Drawdowns

APHKX vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APHKX drawdown since its inception was -56.33%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APHKX and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APHKXNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.33%

-81.30%

+24.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.96%

-27.25%

+17.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-36.57%

+25.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.83%

-62.40%

+37.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.07%

-62.40%

+24.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-16.65%

+16.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.11%

-41.39%

+32.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

9.88%

-6.94%

Volatility

APHKX vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Artisan International Value Fund (APHKX) is 4.35%, while Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 12.91%. This indicates that APHKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APHKXNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

12.91%

-8.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

35.97%

-24.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

46.49%

-32.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.94%

37.67%

-23.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

35.50%

-19.34%

Dividends

APHKX vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

APHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.49%, more than NEM's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APHKX
Artisan International Value Fund
6.49%7.10%4.34%3.10%2.28%10.00%0.98%3.92%5.69%4.15%3.31%6.40%
NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corporation
0.93%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


APHKX and NEM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEM has higher volatility (12.91%) compared to APHKX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APHKX dropped -56.33% vs NEM's -81.30%.

NEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APHKX and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer