APHKX vs. NEM
APHKX (Artisan International Value Fund) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Artisan, while NEM (Newmont Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, APHKX returned 11.60%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for NEM. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
APHKX vs. NEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APHKX achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly higher than NEM's -1.59% return. Over the past 10 years, APHKX has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of 11.60%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.
APHKX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
NEM
- 1D
- -3.89%
- 1M
- -8.89%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -6.63%
- 1Y
- 66.30%
- 3Y*
- 35.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
APHKX vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APHKX Artisan International Value Fund | 10.82% | 22.84% | 6.64% | 22.95% | -6.78% | 16.94% | 8.81% | 24.22% | -15.48% | 24.09% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | -1.59% | 172.82% | -7.83% | -8.76% | -20.77% | 7.40% | 40.28% | 30.52% | -6.15% | 10.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between APHKX and NEM is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2006 | 0.27 |
The correlation between APHKX and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (10 years) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APHKX vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank
APHKX
NEM
APHKX vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan International Value Fund (APHKX) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APHKX | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.27 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 5.93 | +2.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APHKX vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APHKX drawdown since its inception was -56.33%, smaller than the maximum NEM drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APHKX and NEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APHKX | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.33% | -81.30% | +24.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.96% | -29.39% | +19.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.87% | -36.57% | +25.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.83% | -62.40% | +37.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.07% | -62.40% | +24.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -25.53% | +24.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -41.36% | +32.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 11.22% | -8.29% |
Volatility
APHKX vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Artisan International Value Fund (APHKX) is 3.94%, while Newmont Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 15.78%. This indicates that APHKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APHKX | NEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 15.78% | -11.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | 37.82% | -27.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.92% | 47.80% | -33.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 38.04% | -24.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.13% | 35.71% | -19.58% |
Dividends
APHKX vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison
APHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than NEM's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APHKX Artisan International Value Fund | 6.44% | 7.10% | 4.34% | 3.10% | 2.28% | 10.00% | 0.98% | 3.92% | 5.69% | 4.15% | 3.31% | 6.40% |
NEM Newmont Corporation | 1.04% | 1.00% | 2.69% | 3.87% | 4.66% | 3.55% | 1.74% | 3.31% | 1.62% | 0.67% | 0.37% | 0.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APHKX and NEM have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEM has higher volatility (15.78%) compared to APHKX (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APHKX dropped -56.33% vs NEM's -81.30%.
APHKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APHKX and NEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer