PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APGYX vs. ANBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APGYX vs. ANBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) and AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APGYX achieves a 4.80% return, which is significantly higher than ANBIX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, APGYX has outperformed ANBIX with an annualized return of 16.50%, while ANBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.64% annualized return.


APGYX

1D
-0.85%
1M
2.49%
YTD
4.80%
6M
3.88%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
16.50%

ANBIX

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.08%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.58%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*
3.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APGYX vs. ANBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APGYX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class
4.80%13.25%25.40%35.01%-28.78%28.92%34.38%34.13%2.22%31.68%
ANBIX
AB Bond Inflation Strategy
1.58%7.52%3.20%5.20%-8.50%6.35%9.35%9.29%-0.76%2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between APGYX and ANBIX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2010

-0.01

The correlation between APGYX and ANBIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APGYX vs. ANBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APGYX
APGYX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
APGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
APGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

ANBIX
ANBIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ANBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ANBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APGYX vs. ANBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) and AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APGYXANBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.45

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

4.35

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

16.38

-12.58

APGYX vs. ANBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APGYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the ANBIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APGYX and ANBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APGYXANBIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.19

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.52

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.91

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.86

-0.37

Drawdowns

APGYX vs. ANBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APGYX drawdown since its inception was -66.33%, which is greater than ANBIX's maximum drawdown of -11.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APGYX and ANBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APGYXANBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.33%

-11.56%

-54.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.24%

-1.05%

-14.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.59%

-2.52%

-19.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-10.85%

-23.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.91%

-11.56%

-22.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-0.03%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.00%

-2.19%

-18.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

0.28%

+3.82%

Volatility

APGYX vs. ANBIX - Volatility Comparison

AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) at 0.60%. This indicates that APGYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APGYXANBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

0.60%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

1.44%

+9.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.38%

2.10%

+12.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.16%

4.49%

+15.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

4.00%

+15.67%

APGYX vs. ANBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both APGYX and ANBIX have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

APGYX vs. ANBIX - Dividend Comparison

APGYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than ANBIX's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANBIX
AB Bond Inflation Strategy
4.27%4.93%3.86%4.55%6.47%4.70%2.22%3.19%3.39%2.05%2.13%1.61%
APGYX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class
9.31%9.76%6.58%1.65%0.86%7.17%2.59%3.43%9.08%3.77%2.67%8.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


APGYX and ANBIX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APGYX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to ANBIX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APGYX dropped -66.33% vs ANBIX's -11.56%.

ANBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APGYX and ANBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer