APGAX vs. AWPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) and AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX).
APGAX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Oct 1, 1996. AWPAX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jun 1, 1994.
Performance
APGAX vs. AWPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
APGAX vs. AWPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APGAX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | -9.74% | 12.96% | 25.09% | 34.66% | -28.96% | 28.60% | 34.05% | 33.77% | 1.97% | 31.36% |
AWPAX AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund | -8.31% | 13.57% | -0.32% | 13.09% | -26.80% | 9.20% | 29.55% | 26.88% | -17.50% | 34.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APGAX achieves a -9.74% return, which is significantly lower than AWPAX's -8.31% return. Over the past 10 years, APGAX has outperformed AWPAX with an annualized return of 14.55%, while AWPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.06% annualized return.
APGAX
- 1D
- 3.56%
- 1M
- -6.63%
- YTD
- -9.74%
- 6M
- -9.77%
- 1Y
- 10.66%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
AWPAX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -12.94%
- YTD
- -8.31%
- 6M
- -8.14%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.06%
- 5Y*
- -1.02%
- 10Y*
- 5.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
APGAX vs. AWPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
APGAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than AWPAX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
APGAX vs. AWPAX — Risk / Return Rank
APGAX
AWPAX
APGAX vs. AWPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) and AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APGAX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 0.20 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.97 | 0.40 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.05 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 0.17 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.86 | 0.69 | +2.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APGAX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 0.20 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | -0.06 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.31 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.31 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between APGAX and AWPAX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
APGAX vs. AWPAX - Dividend Comparison
APGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.53%, while AWPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APGAX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A | 12.53% | 11.31% | 7.44% | 1.75% | 0.97% | 8.04% | 2.87% | 3.66% | 9.96% | 4.09% | 2.74% | 9.23% |
AWPAX AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 7.00% | 1.67% | 1.11% | 14.44% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
APGAX vs. AWPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APGAX drawdown since its inception was -67.19%, which is greater than AWPAX's maximum drawdown of -63.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APGAX and AWPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| APGAX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.19% | -63.00% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.33% | -13.44% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.04% | -38.13% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -38.13% | +4.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.32% | -16.29% | +3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.51% | -18.85% | -0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 3.40% | +0.61% |
Volatility
APGAX vs. AWPAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) is 6.50%, while AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that APGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| APGAX | AWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 7.75% | -1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.37% | 11.71% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.19% | 16.99% | +3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 17.04% | +3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.63% | 16.63% | +3.00% |