AWPAX vs. APGZX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AWPAX (AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund) and APGZX (AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z) are both mutual funds - AWPAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while APGZX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, AWPAX returned 6.46%/yr vs 16.68%/yr for APGZX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AWPAX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for APGZX.

Performance

AWPAX vs. APGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AWPAX achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly higher than APGZX's 3.82% return. Over the past 10 years, AWPAX has underperformed APGZX with an annualized return of 6.46%, while APGZX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.68% annualized return.

AWPAX

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 6.58%
• 6M: 6.68%
• 1Y: 10.99%
• 3Y*: 7.01%
• 5Y*: 1.22%
• 10Y*: 6.46%

APGZX

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 3.82%
• 6M: 3.70%
• 1Y: 15.53%
• 3Y*: 18.11%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: 16.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AWPAX vs. APGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AWPAX AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund	6.58%	13.57%	-0.32%	13.09%	-26.80%	9.20%	29.55%	26.88%	-17.50%	34.46%
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z	3.82%	13.26%	25.47%	35.12%	-28.74%	29.00%	34.47%	34.24%	2.30%	31.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AWPAX and APGZX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.75

The correlation between AWPAX and APGZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AWPAX vs. APGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AWPAX

AWPAX Risk / Return Rank: 8
AWPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
AWPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
AWPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
AWPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
AWPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

APGZX

APGZX Risk / Return Rank: 13
APGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
APGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
APGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
APGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
APGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AWPAX vs. APGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AWPAX	APGZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	0.98	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	1.43	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.18	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	0.96	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.80	3.52	-0.72

AWPAX vs. APGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AWPAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the APGZX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AWPAX and APGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AWPAX vs. APGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AWPAX drawdown since its inception was -63.00%, which is greater than APGZX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AWPAX and APGZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AWPAX	APGZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.00%	-33.87%	-29.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.44%	-15.21%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.47%	-21.57%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.13%	-33.87%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.13%	-33.87%	-4.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-2.44%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.75%	-6.01%	-12.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	4.14%	-0.48%

Volatility

AWPAX vs. APGZX - Volatility Comparison

AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund (AWPAX) has a higher volatility of 7.10% compared to AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) at 5.42%. This indicates that AWPAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AWPAX	APGZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.10%	5.42%	+1.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.22%	11.82%	+3.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.29%	14.97%	+2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.57%	20.24%	-2.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.90%	19.71%	-2.81%

AWPAX vs. APGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AWPAX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than APGZX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

AWPAX vs. APGZX - Dividend Comparison

AWPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z	9.41%	9.77%	6.62%	1.69%	0.87%	7.19%	2.60%	3.49%	9.11%	3.78%	2.72%
AWPAX AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.52%	7.00%	1.67%	1.11%	14.44%	0.00%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AWPAX and APGZX in my portfolio?

AWPAX and APGZX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AWPAX or APGZX?

AWPAX has higher volatility (7.10%) compared to APGZX (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AWPAX dropped -63.00% vs APGZX's -33.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.