PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APGAX vs. APGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APGAX vs. APGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with APGAX having a 5.59% return and APGZX slightly higher at 5.74%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with APGAX having a 16.31% annualized return and APGZX not far ahead at 16.68%.


APGAX

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.66%
YTD
5.59%
6M
4.68%
1Y
16.23%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
11.17%
10Y*
16.31%

APGZX

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.68%
YTD
5.74%
6M
4.86%
1Y
16.55%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
16.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APGAX vs. APGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APGAX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
5.59%12.96%25.09%34.66%-28.96%28.60%34.05%33.77%1.97%31.36%
APGZX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z
5.74%13.26%25.47%35.12%-28.74%29.00%34.47%34.24%2.30%31.81%

Correlation

The correlation between APGAX and APGZX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

1.00

The correlation between APGAX and APGZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APGAX vs. APGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APGAX
APGAX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
APGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
APGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

APGZX
APGZX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
APGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
APGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APGAX vs. APGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APGAXAPGZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

1.15

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.13

4.26

-0.13

APGAX vs. APGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the APGZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APGAX and APGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APGAXAPGZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.21

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.57

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.85

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.83

-0.29

Drawdowns

APGAX vs. APGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APGAX drawdown since its inception was -67.19%, which is greater than APGZX's maximum drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APGAX and APGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APGAXAPGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.19%

-33.87%

-33.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.33%

-15.21%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.63%

-21.57%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.04%

-33.87%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

-33.87%

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.63%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-6.02%

-13.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

4.09%

+0.05%

Volatility

APGAX vs. APGZX - Volatility Comparison

AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A (APGAX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) have volatilities of 3.20% and 3.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APGAXAPGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

3.21%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

10.91%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

14.36%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.16%

20.15%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

19.67%

0.00%

APGAX vs. APGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APGAX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than APGZX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

APGAX vs. APGZX - Dividend Comparison

APGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.71%, more than APGZX's 9.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APGAX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class A
10.71%11.31%7.44%1.75%0.97%8.04%2.87%3.66%9.96%4.09%2.74%9.23%
APGZX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z
9.24%9.77%6.62%1.69%0.87%7.19%2.60%3.49%9.11%3.78%2.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, APGAX and APGZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

APGZX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to APGAX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APGAX dropped -67.19% vs APGZX's -33.87%.

APGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APGAX and APGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer