PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
APFDX vs. GCCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

APFDX vs. GCCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Artisan Global Discovery Fund (APFDX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APFDX achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than GCCHX's 28.83% return.


APFDX

1D
0.79%
1M
3.69%
YTD
4.43%
6M
3.51%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*

GCCHX

1D
1.60%
1M
7.08%
YTD
28.83%
6M
29.87%
1Y
82.70%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APFDX vs. GCCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
APFDX
Artisan Global Discovery Fund
4.43%12.07%16.11%20.66%-31.14%12.04%45.70%42.57%-2.58%4.94%
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
28.83%39.25%-25.63%-6.85%-10.39%21.84%42.82%27.36%-16.35%7.78%

Correlation

The correlation between APFDX and GCCHX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2017

0.71

The correlation between APFDX and GCCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

APFDX vs. GCCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APFDX
APFDX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
APFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
APFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
APFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
APFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

GCCHX
GCCHX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
GCCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APFDX vs. GCCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan Global Discovery Fund (APFDX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


APFDXGCCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.57

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

7.41

-6.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

24.13

-20.17

APFDX vs. GCCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APFDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the GCCHX Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APFDX and GCCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


APFDXGCCHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

3.70

-2.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.15

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.44

+0.15

Drawdowns

APFDX vs. GCCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APFDX drawdown since its inception was -40.83%, smaller than the maximum GCCHX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APFDX and GCCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


APFDXGCCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.83%

-54.32%

+13.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-11.76%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.19%

-52.03%

+30.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.83%

-54.32%

+13.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

0.00%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-13.91%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

3.61%

-0.33%

Volatility

APFDX vs. GCCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Artisan Global Discovery Fund (APFDX) is 5.62%, while GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that APFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


APFDXGCCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

6.47%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

16.31%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.38%

23.57%

-7.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.57%

26.95%

-6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

25.15%

-4.68%

APFDX vs. GCCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

APFDX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GCCHX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

APFDX vs. GCCHX - Dividend Comparison

APFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.79%, more than GCCHX's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
APFDX
Artisan Global Discovery Fund
18.79%19.63%0.87%0.00%0.00%7.91%1.88%0.00%0.51%0.62%
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
1.17%1.51%0.66%0.96%2.24%25.43%5.42%4.03%2.62%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


APFDX and GCCHX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCCHX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to APFDX (5.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APFDX dropped -40.83% vs GCCHX's -54.32%.

GCCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for APFDX and GCCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer