APEX.L vs. CSH2.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

APEX.L (Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc) and CSH2.L (Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - APEX.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while CSH2.L is a Money Market fund actively managed by Amundi. APEX.L is passively managed, while CSH2.L is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, APEX.L returned 8.31%/yr vs 2.57%/yr for CSH2.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. APEX.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSH2.L.

Performance

APEX.L vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc (APEX.L) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

APEX.L is traded in USD, while CSH2.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSH2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APEX.L achieves a 30.37% return, which is significantly higher than CSH2.L's 1.47% return.

APEX.L

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 10.48%
• YTD: 30.37%
• 6M: 33.80%
• 1Y: 59.06%
• 3Y*: 25.18%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: —

CSH2.L

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 2.64%
• 1Y: 3.68%
• 3Y*: 7.67%
• 5Y*: 2.57%
• 10Y*: 1.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APEX.L vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
APEX.L Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc	30.37%	32.38%	11.51%	4.94%	-18.85%	-3.67%	0.79%
CSH2.L Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP	1.47%	12.57%	3.85%	10.24%	-9.32%	-0.78%	2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between APEX.L and CSH2.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2020	0.29

APEX.L vs. CSH2.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	APEX.L	CSH2.L
Technology	41.6%	35.9%
Financial Services	17.7%	10.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.3%	13.9%
Industrials	8.3%	6.3%
Communication Services	6.9%	13.9%
Basic Materials	3.6%	1.0%
Healthcare	3.0%	11.3%
Energy	2.7%	1.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	4.9%
Utilities	1.9%	1.1%
Real Estate	1.7%	0.0%

Return for Risk

APEX.L vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APEX.L

APEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 85
APEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
APEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
APEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
APEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
APEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 83

CSH2.L

CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APEX.L vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc (APEX.L) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APEX.L	CSH2.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.97	0.55	+2.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	0.85	+3.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.10	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.57	0.89	+3.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.66	1.95	+14.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APEX.L vs. CSH2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APEX.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.97, which is higher than the CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APEX.L and CSH2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APEX.L	CSH2.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97	0.55	+2.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.30	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.07	+0.50

Drawdowns

APEX.L vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APEX.L drawdown since its inception was -43.98%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -29.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APEX.L and CSH2.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	APEX.L	CSH2.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.98%	-29.83%	-14.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.85%	-4.11%	-8.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.72%	-7.81%	-10.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.58%	-23.98%	-15.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-1.65%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.18%	-12.73%	-8.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	1.88%	+1.65%

Volatility

APEX.L vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc (APEX.L) has a higher volatility of 8.24% compared to Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) at 1.82%. This indicates that APEX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APEX.L	CSH2.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.24%	1.82%	+6.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.85%	4.94%	+11.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.80%	6.63%	+13.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.00%	8.55%	+11.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.68%	9.36%	+11.32%

APEX.L vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

APEX.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH2.L's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

APEX.L vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither APEX.L nor CSH2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both APEX.L and CSH2.L in my portfolio?

APEX.L and CSH2.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, APEX.L or CSH2.L?

On fees, CSH2.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, APEX.L or CSH2.L?

CSH2.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for APEX.L.

What is the main difference between APEX.L and CSH2.L?

APEX.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CSH2.L is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for APEX.L and 0.07% for CSH2.L.