APEX.L vs. XKS2.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc (APEX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L).
APEX.L and XKS2.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. APEX.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Feb 21, 2019. XKS2.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI Korea NR USD. It was launched on Jul 5, 2007. Both APEX.L and XKS2.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
APEX.L vs. XKS2.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
APEX.L vs. XKS2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APEX.L Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc | 4.12% | 32.38% | 11.51% | 4.94% | -18.85% | -3.67% | 0.79% |
XKS2.L Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C | 31.10% | 99.81% | -22.97% | 19.42% | -28.16% | -8.05% | 6.29% |
Different Trading Currencies
APEX.L is traded in USD, while XKS2.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XKS2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APEX.L achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than XKS2.L's 31.10% return.
APEX.L
- 1D
- 4.23%
- 1M
- -6.56%
- YTD
- 4.12%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- 1Y
- 33.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- —
XKS2.L
- 1D
- 9.59%
- 1M
- -12.16%
- YTD
- 31.10%
- 6M
- 62.26%
- 1Y
- 142.94%
- 3Y*
- 30.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
APEX.L vs. XKS2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
APEX.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than XKS2.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
APEX.L vs. XKS2.L — Risk / Return Rank
APEX.L
XKS2.L
APEX.L vs. XKS2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc (APEX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| APEX.L | XKS2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 4.34 | -2.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 4.61 | -2.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.65 | -0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 6.27 | -3.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | 25.04 | -15.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| APEX.L | XKS2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 4.34 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.35 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.18 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between APEX.L and XKS2.L is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
APEX.L vs. XKS2.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither APEX.L nor XKS2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
APEX.L vs. XKS2.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APEX.L drawdown since its inception was -43.98%, smaller than the maximum XKS2.L drawdown of -71.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APEX.L and XKS2.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| APEX.L | XKS2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.98% | -62.63% | +18.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.87% | -21.33% | +8.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.73% | -41.55% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.17% | -14.35% | +5.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.96% | -15.88% | -6.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 5.65% | -2.12% |
Volatility
APEX.L vs. XKS2.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan UCITS ETF - Acc (APEX.L) is 8.00%, while Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) has a volatility of 17.03%. This indicates that APEX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XKS2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| APEX.L | XKS2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | 17.03% | -9.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.93% | 28.22% | -14.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.68% | 32.82% | -13.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 25.52% | -5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.24% | 24.90% | -4.66% |