APCB vs. IUSB
APCB (ActivePassive Core Bond ETF) and IUSB (iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. APCB is actively managed, while IUSB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, APCB returned 4.01%/yr vs 4.47%/yr for IUSB. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. APCB charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IUSB.
Performance
APCB vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APCB achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than IUSB's 0.54% return.
APCB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 4.35%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSB
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- 0.40%
- 10Y*
- 1.89%
APCB vs. IUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF | 0.46% | 6.87% | 1.45% | 1.57% |
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 0.54% | 7.38% | 2.11% | 2.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between APCB and IUSB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2023 | 0.96 |
The correlation between APCB and IUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APCB vs. IUSB — Risk / Return Rank
APCB
IUSB
APCB vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APCB | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.92 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 5.54 | -0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APCB vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APCB drawdown since its inception was -6.42%, smaller than the maximum IUSB drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APCB and IUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APCB | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.42% | -17.90% | +11.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.58% | -2.53% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.32% | -5.82% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -1.22% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.51% | -3.58% | +2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.87% | +0.03% |
Volatility
APCB vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) is 1.01%, while iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that APCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APCB | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 1.08% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.54% | 2.73% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.42% | 3.59% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 5.80% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 5.05% | -0.22% |
APCB vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
APCB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
APCB vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison
APCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than IUSB's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.35% | 4.74% | 2.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 4.23% | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.68% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, APCB and IUSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IUSB has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to APCB (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APCB dropped -6.42% vs IUSB's -17.90%.
On 3-year performance, IUSB leads with 4.47% vs 4.01% for APCB. On fees, IUSB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IUSB has performed better with a 4.47% return vs 4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for APCB.
APCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 4.23% for IUSB.
They also come from different issuers: ActivePassive and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for APCB and 0.06% for IUSB.
IUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APCB and IUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer