APCB vs. EVTR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR).

APCB and EVTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. APCB is an actively managed fund by ActivePassive. It was launched on May 2, 2023. EVTR is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Nov 14, 1984.

Performance

APCB vs. EVTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

APCB vs. EVTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF	-0.12%	6.87%	2.45%
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	-0.22%	8.10%	4.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, APCB achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly higher than EVTR's -0.22% return.

APCB

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -1.41%
• YTD: -0.12%
• 6M: 0.73%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EVTR

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: -0.22%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 4.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

APCB vs. EVTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

APCB has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than EVTR's 0.32% expense ratio.

APCB

ActivePassive Core Bond ETF

EVTR

Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF

Return for Risk

APCB vs. EVTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APCB

APCB Risk / Return Rank: 49
APCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
APCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
APCB Omega Ratio Rank: 42
APCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
APCB Martin Ratio Rank: 45

EVTR

EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 63
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 57
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

APCB vs. EVTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	APCB	EVTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.24	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	1.74	-0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.22	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.66	1.77	-0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.04	6.07	-1.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

APCB vs. EVTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current APCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the EVTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of APCB and EVTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	APCB	EVTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.24	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	1.38	-0.70

Correlation

The correlation between APCB and EVTR is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

APCB vs. EVTR - Dividend Comparison

APCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than EVTR's 4.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APCB ActivePassive Core Bond ETF	4.35%	4.35%	4.74%	2.22%
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	4.63%	4.51%	4.26%	0.00%

Drawdowns

APCB vs. EVTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum APCB drawdown since its inception was -6.42%, which is greater than EVTR's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APCB and EVTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	APCB	EVTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-4.08%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.51%	-2.85%	+0.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-1.94%	+0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-0.92%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.83%	0.83%	0.00%

Volatility

APCB vs. EVTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ActivePassive Core Bond ETF (APCB) is 1.48%, while Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that APCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	APCB	EVTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.48%	1.66%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.32%	2.42%	-0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.89%	3.90%	-0.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.91%	4.30%	+0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.91%	4.30%	+0.61%