PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AALB.AS vs. IBE.MC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AALB.AS vs. IBE.MC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Aalberts Industries NV (AALB.AS) and Iberdrola S.A. (IBE.MC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AALB.AS achieves a 42.65% return, which is significantly higher than IBE.MC's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, AALB.AS has underperformed IBE.MC with an annualized return of 4.93%, while IBE.MC has yielded a comparatively higher 17.32% annualized return.


AALB.AS

1D
-1.23%
1M
10.29%
YTD
42.65%
6M
46.51%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
1.97%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
4.93%

IBE.MC

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
7.09%
6M
9.80%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
17.92%
10Y*
17.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AALB.AS vs. IBE.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AALB.AS
Aalberts Industries NV
42.65%-14.77%-10.34%11.34%-34.58%61.87%-6.23%40.74%-30.39%39.85%
IBE.MC
Iberdrola S.A.
7.09%44.88%17.42%13.52%9.72%-7.61%32.72%36.69%14.06%8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AALB.AS and IBE.MC is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 1991

0.24

The correlation between AALB.AS and IBE.MC shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AALB.AS vs. IBE.MC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AALB.AS
AALB.AS Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AALB.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AALB.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
AALB.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AALB.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AALB.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IBE.MC
IBE.MC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IBE.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBE.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBE.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IBE.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBE.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AALB.AS vs. IBE.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aalberts Industries NV (AALB.AS) and Iberdrola S.A. (IBE.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AALB.ASIBE.MCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.34

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

3.87

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.36

8.57

-6.21

AALB.AS vs. IBE.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AALB.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the IBE.MC Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AALB.AS and IBE.MC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AALB.ASIBE.MCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.84

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.95

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.85

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.52

-0.14

Drawdowns

AALB.AS vs. IBE.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AALB.AS drawdown since its inception was -84.14%, which is greater than IBE.MC's maximum drawdown of -71.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AALB.AS and IBE.MC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AALB.ASIBE.MCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.14%

-71.21%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.08%

-6.98%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.75%

-16.42%

-28.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.28%

-19.72%

-31.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.29%

-28.27%

-30.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.71%

-4.74%

-16.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.95%

-16.76%

-4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.16%

3.17%

+8.99%

Volatility

AALB.AS vs. IBE.MC - Volatility Comparison

Aalberts Industries NV (AALB.AS) has a higher volatility of 9.44% compared to Iberdrola S.A. (IBE.MC) at 3.85%. This indicates that AALB.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBE.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AALB.ASIBE.MCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.44%

3.85%

+5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.21%

11.14%

+13.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.55%

14.71%

+18.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.58%

18.57%

+14.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.83%

19.98%

+10.85%

Dividends

AALB.AS vs. IBE.MC - Dividend Comparison

AALB.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than IBE.MC's 3.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AALB.AS
Aalberts Industries NV
2.98%4.03%3.29%2.83%6.32%1.03%2.19%1.87%2.24%1.37%1.69%1.45%
IBE.MC
Iberdrola S.A.
3.46%3.49%4.23%4.22%4.11%4.05%3.42%3.82%4.65%4.83%2.52%2.20%

Financials

AALB.AS vs. IBE.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aalberts Industries NV and Iberdrola S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AALB.AS and IBE.MC have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AALB.AS and IBE.MC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer