AOTIX vs. FPADX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AOTIX (Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund) and FPADX (Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 10 years, AOTIX returned 11.55%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for FPADX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AOTIX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for FPADX.

Performance

AOTIX vs. FPADX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTIX achieves a 38.59% return, which is significantly higher than FPADX's 29.97% return. Over the past 10 years, AOTIX has outperformed FPADX with an annualized return of 11.55%, while FPADX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.60% annualized return.

AOTIX

• 1D: 1.63%
• 1M: 11.97%
• YTD: 38.59%
• 6M: 40.49%
• 1Y: 68.70%
• 3Y*: 26.37%
• 5Y*: 9.61%
• 10Y*: 11.55%

FPADX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 7.56%
• YTD: 29.97%
• 6M: 31.22%
• 1Y: 54.93%
• 3Y*: 24.86%
• 5Y*: 8.23%
• 10Y*: 10.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTIX vs. FPADX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AOTIX Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	38.59%	29.73%	5.44%	17.83%	-22.10%	-0.26%	20.78%	17.66%	-16.62%	38.37%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	29.97%	33.90%	6.80%	9.51%	-20.06%	-3.07%	17.84%	18.28%	-14.65%	35.16%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTIX and FPADX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011	0.90

The correlation between AOTIX and FPADX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AOTIX vs. FPADX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTIX

AOTIX Risk / Return Rank: 94
AOTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AOTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AOTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AOTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
AOTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

FPADX

FPADX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FPADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FPADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FPADX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FPADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FPADX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTIX vs. FPADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AOTIX	FPADX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.45	2.78	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.15	3.46	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.53	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.03	4.22	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.19	15.86	+3.33

AOTIX vs. FPADX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOTIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is comparable to the FPADX Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOTIX and FPADX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AOTIX vs. FPADX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTIX drawdown since its inception was -68.42%, which is greater than FPADX's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTIX and FPADX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOTIX	FPADX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.42%	-39.16%	-29.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.70%	-13.28%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.76%	-16.09%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.46%	-36.86%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.05%	-39.16%	+1.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.06%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.62%	-13.22%	-5.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.59%	3.52%	+0.07%

Volatility

AOTIX vs. FPADX - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (AOTIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund (FPADX) have volatilities of 10.80% and 10.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOTIX	FPADX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.80%	10.85%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.71%	18.16%	-0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.04%	20.17%	-0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.89%	17.63%	-0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.65%	18.05%	-0.40%

AOTIX vs. FPADX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTIX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FPADX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOTIX vs. FPADX - Dividend Comparison

AOTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than FPADX's 1.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOTIX Virtus Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund	2.40%	3.33%	6.13%	3.48%	3.15%	1.94%	1.40%	2.37%	2.81%	1.60%	1.91%	1.10%
FPADX Fidelity Emerging Markets Index Fund	1.81%	2.35%	2.70%	2.68%	2.47%	2.14%	1.50%	2.59%	2.20%	0.12%	1.69%	2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOTIX and FPADX in my portfolio?

AOTIX and FPADX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOTIX or FPADX?

FPADX has higher volatility (10.85%) compared to AOTIX (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOTIX dropped -68.42% vs FPADX's -39.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AOTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.