PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOTG vs. VTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOTG vs. VTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than VTG's -0.10% return.


AOTG

1D
-3.26%
1M
-2.22%
6M
10.76%
YTD
10.18%
1Y
21.05%
3Y*
23.17%
5Y*
10Y*

VTG

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-0.27%
YTD
-0.10%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTG vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AOTG
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF
10.18%13.19%
VTG
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
-0.10%3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTG and VTG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOTG vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTG
AOTG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
AOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
AOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VTG
VTG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
VTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTG Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTG vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AOTGVTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.17

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

1.14

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.58

2.94

-0.36

AOTG vs. VTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOTG Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the VTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOTG and VTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AOTG vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, which is greater than VTG's maximum drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and VTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOTGVTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.63%

-2.89%

-28.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.85%

-2.89%

-19.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.80%

-1.88%

-5.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-0.84%

-6.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.18%

1.12%

+7.06%

Volatility

AOTG vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison

AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) at 1.05%. This indicates that AOTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOTGVTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.68%

1.05%

+8.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.30%

2.65%

+19.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.59%

3.52%

+23.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.56%

3.52%

+26.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.56%

3.52%

+26.04%

AOTG vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

AOTG vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison

AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%.


PositionTTM2025
AOTG
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF
0.00%0.00%
VTG
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
3.54%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOTG and VTG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOTG has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to VTG (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOTG dropped -31.63% vs VTG's -2.89%.

On 1-year performance, AOTG leads with 21.05% vs 3.29% for VTG. On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTG has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AOTG has performed better with a 21.05% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AOTG.

VTG has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.00% for AOTG.

AOTG is categorized as Technology Equities, while VTG is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: AOT and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AOTG and 0.03% for VTG.

VTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOTG and VTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer