AOTG vs. VTG
AOTG (AOT Growth and Innovation ETF) and VTG (Vanguard Total Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AOTG is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by AOT, while VTG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index. AOTG is actively managed, while VTG is passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTG.
Performance
AOTG vs. VTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly higher than VTG's 0.01% return.
AOTG
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 16.15%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 39.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTG
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOTG vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | 16.15% | 12.00% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 0.01% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOTG and VTG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOTG vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank
AOTG
VTG
AOTG vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOTG | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.98 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOTG | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.91 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
AOTG vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, which is greater than VTG's maximum drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and VTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOTG | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -2.89% | -28.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.81% | -1.78% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -0.74% | -7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | — | — |
Volatility
AOTG vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOTG | VTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 3.51% | +20.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 3.51% | +25.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 3.51% | +25.75% |
AOTG vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOTG vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison
AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 3.20% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AOTG and VTG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AOTG.
VTG has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.00% for AOTG.
AOTG is categorized as Technology Equities, while VTG is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: AOT and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AOTG and 0.03% for VTG.
Find the right allocation for AOTG and VTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer