AOTG vs. TRUT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AOTG (AOT Growth and Innovation ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AOTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.

Performance

AOTG vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than TRUT's 15.16% return.

AOTG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 2.87%
• YTD: 10.32%
• 6M: 8.42%
• 1Y: 27.36%
• 3Y*: 26.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRUT

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: 15.16%
• 6M: 13.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTG vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	10.32%	10.11%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	15.16%	9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTG and TRUT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

AOTG vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTG

AOTG Risk / Return Rank: 29
AOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
AOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
AOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
AOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
AOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTG vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AOTG	TRUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.39	—	—

Drawdowns

AOTG vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and TRUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOTG	TRUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.63%	-18.55%	-13.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.69%	-9.44%	+1.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.86%	-5.29%	-2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.09%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AOTG	TRUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.87%	23.17%	+2.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.54%	23.17%	+6.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.54%	23.17%	+6.37%

AOTG vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOTG vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.

Position	TTM	2025
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.20%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOTG and TRUT in my portfolio?

AOTG and TRUT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AOTG or TRUT?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOTG or TRUT?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AOTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOTG or TRUT?

TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for AOTG.

What is the main difference between AOTG and TRUT?

They also come from different issuers: AOT and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AOTG and 0.13% for TRUT.