AOTG vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AOTG (AOT Growth and Innovation ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. AOTG is actively managed, while KROP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AOTG returned 28.98%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for KROP. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

AOTG vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AOTG having a 16.15% return and KROP slightly higher at 16.59%.

AOTG

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 12.54%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 6M: 14.95%
• 1Y: 39.35%
• 3Y*: 28.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 0.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTG vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	16.15%	25.26%	32.20%	54.58%	-11.53%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.59%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-9.49%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTG and KROP is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022	0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between AOTG and KROP has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AOTG vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AOTG	KROP
Technology	62.8%	-
Communication Services	16.3%	-
Financial Services	11.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	0.3%
Industrials	0.7%	39.7%
Healthcare	0.3%	0.3%
Basic Materials	-	32.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	26.3%
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AOTG vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTG

AOTG Risk / Return Rank: 42
AOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
AOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
AOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
AOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 23
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTG vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOTG	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	0.81	+0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	1.24	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.15	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	1.14	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.98	2.58	+2.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOTG vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOTG and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOTG	KROP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	0.81	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	-0.57	+1.53

Drawdowns

AOTG vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOTG	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.63%	-61.96%	+30.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.85%	-11.29%	-11.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.41%	-28.70%	+1.29%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-48.93%	+46.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.89%	-44.50%	+36.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.93%	4.99%	+2.94%

Volatility

AOTG vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.69%. This indicates that AOTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOTG	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	4.69%	+2.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.77%	11.98%	+6.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.89%	16.04%	+7.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.26%	22.27%	+6.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.26%	22.27%	+6.99%

AOTG vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOTG vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.34%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOTG and KROP in my portfolio?

AOTG and KROP have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOTG or KROP?

AOTG has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to KROP (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOTG dropped -31.63% vs KROP's -61.96%.

Which ETF is better, AOTG or KROP?

On 3-year performance, AOTG leads with 28.98% vs 0.72% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOTG or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, AOTG has performed better with a 28.98% return vs 0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOTG or KROP?

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AOTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOTG or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.00% for AOTG.

What is the main difference between AOTG and KROP?

They also come from different issuers: AOT and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AOTG and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AOTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.