AOTG vs. CRTC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AOTG (AOT Growth and Innovation ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. AOTG is actively managed, while CRTC is passively managed. Over the past year, AOTG returned 27.36% vs 14.26% for CRTC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AOTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

AOTG vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOTG achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 3.20% return.

AOTG

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 2.87%
• YTD: 10.32%
• 6M: 8.42%
• 1Y: 27.36%
• 3Y*: 26.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRTC

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -2.77%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 14.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOTG vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	10.32%	25.26%	32.20%	9.39%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	3.20%	18.69%	18.05%	7.16%

Correlation

The correlation between AOTG and CRTC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2023	0.86

The correlation between AOTG and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

AOTG vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AOTG	CRTC
Technology	67.4%	39.5%
Communication Services	15.0%	15.0%
Financial Services	9.7%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	5.4%
Industrials	0.6%	12.6%
Healthcare	0.2%	12.7%
Basic Materials	-	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Energy	-	6.0%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	5.3%

Return for Risk

AOTG vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOTG

AOTG Risk / Return Rank: 29
AOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
AOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
AOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
AOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
AOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 33
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 30
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOTG vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AOTG	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	1.06	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	1.47	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.19	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	1.58	-0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.39	5.45	-2.06

AOTG vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOTG and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AOTG vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOTG drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOTG and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOTG	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.63%	-19.07%	-12.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.85%	-9.05%	-13.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.69%	-6.17%	-1.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.86%	-2.17%	-5.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.09%	2.62%	+5.47%

Volatility

AOTG vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) has a higher volatility of 12.25% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 5.77%. This indicates that AOTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOTG	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.25%	5.77%	+6.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.16%	10.64%	+10.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.87%	13.57%	+12.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.54%	15.88%	+13.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.54%	15.88%	+13.66%

AOTG vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOTG vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	0.92%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOTG and CRTC in my portfolio?

AOTG and CRTC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AOTG or CRTC?

AOTG has higher volatility (12.25%) compared to CRTC (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOTG dropped -31.63% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, AOTG or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, AOTG leads with 27.36% vs 14.26% for CRTC. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 5.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AOTG or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, AOTG has performed better with a 27.36% return vs 14.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AOTG or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AOTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AOTG or CRTC?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for AOTG.

What is the main difference between AOTG and CRTC?

They also come from different issuers: AOT and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AOTG and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AOTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.