AOR vs. MINV.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L).

AOR and MINV.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOR is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008. MINV.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Nov 30, 2012. Both AOR and MINV.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AOR vs. MINV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AOR vs. MINV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF	-1.02%	16.44%	10.68%	15.75%	-15.64%	11.19%	11.42%	18.91%	-5.82%	15.80%
MINV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF	-0.31%	11.17%	10.98%	6.85%	-9.59%	14.93%	1.99%	23.61%	-2.67%	17.19%

Different Trading Currencies

AOR is traded in USD, while MINV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MINV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOR achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than MINV.L's -0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, AOR has outperformed MINV.L with an annualized return of 7.74%, while MINV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.19% annualized return.

AOR

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: -4.47%
• YTD: -1.02%
• 6M: 1.40%
• 1Y: 14.76%
• 3Y*: 11.65%
• 5Y*: 5.99%
• 10Y*: 7.74%

MINV.L

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -4.94%
• YTD: -0.31%
• 6M: 0.02%
• 1Y: 2.85%
• 3Y*: 9.15%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 7.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOR vs. MINV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MINV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

MINV.L

iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF

AOR

iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF

Return for Risk

AOR vs. MINV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOR

AOR Risk / Return Rank: 80
AOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
AOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
AOR Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
AOR Martin Ratio Rank: 82

MINV.L

MINV.L Risk / Return Rank: 12
MINV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
MINV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
MINV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 12
MINV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
MINV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOR vs. MINV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOR	MINV.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	0.25	+1.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	0.40	+1.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.06	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	0.27	+1.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.58	1.11	+7.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOR vs. MINV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is higher than the MINV.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOR and MINV.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOR	MINV.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	0.25	+1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	0.55	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.59	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.71	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between AOR and MINV.L is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AOR vs. MINV.L - Dividend Comparison

AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while MINV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOR iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF	2.57%	2.55%	2.66%	2.50%	2.12%	1.64%	1.89%	2.56%	2.49%	4.51%	2.16%	2.12%
MINV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

AOR vs. MINV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOR drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, smaller than the maximum MINV.L drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOR and MINV.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOR	MINV.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.44%	-20.38%	-4.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.62%	-7.02%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.72%	-10.23%	-11.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.95%	-20.38%	-2.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.82%	-3.25%	-1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-3.74%	+0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	2.38%	-0.63%

Volatility

AOR vs. MINV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF (AOR) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF (MINV.L) at 3.09%. This indicates that AOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOR	MINV.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	3.09%	+1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.49%	5.80%	+0.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.73%	11.52%	-0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.49%	10.91%	-0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.64%	12.08%	-1.44%