AOMR vs. LBS.TO
AOMR (Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc.) and LBS.TO (Life & Banc Split Corp.) are both stocks. AOMR operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate), while LBS.TO operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, AOMR returned -1.29%/yr vs 35.59%/yr for LBS.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AOMR vs. LBS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AOMR is traded in USD, while LBS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the LBS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AOMR achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly lower than LBS.TO's 85.70% return.
AOMR
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- 12.27%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 10.35%
- 3Y*
- 17.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- —
LBS.TO
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 28.37%
- YTD
- 85.70%
- 6M
- 83.38%
- 1Y
- 152.33%
- 3Y*
- 57.25%
- 5Y*
- 35.59%
- 10Y*
- 29.40%
AOMR vs. LBS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOMR Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. | 12.27% | 6.20% | -1.89% | 159.86% | -67.27% | -10.21% |
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp. | 85.70% | 62.84% | 27.75% | 13.10% | -5.05% | 8.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AOMR and LBS.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
AOMR:
$222.07M
LBS.TO:
CA$682.46M
AOMR:
$0.65
LBS.TO:
CA$8.45
AOMR:
13.83
LBS.TO:
1.57
AOMR:
0.02
LBS.TO:
0.04
AOMR:
3.64
LBS.TO:
4.03
AOMR:
0.86
LBS.TO:
1.01
AOMR:
$61.18M
LBS.TO:
CA$169.21M
AOMR:
$51.68M
LBS.TO:
CA$160.11M
AOMR:
$39.68M
LBS.TO:
CA$425.46M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOMR vs. LBS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AOMR
LBS.TO
AOMR vs. LBS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AOMR | LBS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.81 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 5.95 | -5.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.34 | 25.52 | -24.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AOMR vs. LBS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOMR drawdown since its inception was -71.21%, smaller than the maximum LBS.TO drawdown of -87.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOMR and LBS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOMR | LBS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.21% | -87.59% | +16.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.57% | -25.75% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.21% | -37.03% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.21% | -40.98% | -30.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.37% | -1.03% | -10.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.32% | -15.12% | -8.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.74% | 5.99% | +1.75% |
Volatility
AOMR vs. LBS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) is 8.71%, while Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) has a volatility of 12.70%. This indicates that AOMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOMR | LBS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.71% | 12.70% | -3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.94% | 42.57% | -25.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.49% | 45.63% | -21.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.64% | 31.69% | +6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.61% | 39.99% | -1.38% |
Dividends
AOMR vs. LBS.TO - Dividend Comparison
AOMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.27%, more than LBS.TO's 7.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOMR Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. | 14.27% | 14.87% | 13.79% | 12.08% | 35.31% | 2.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp. | 7.21% | 12.92% | 17.12% | 19.61% | 17.88% | 15.33% | 7.16% | 19.39% | 23.12% | 15.52% | 15.92% | 19.20% |
Financials
AOMR vs. LBS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. and Life & Banc Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AOMR and LBS.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AOMR and LBS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer