PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOMR vs. FPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AOMR vs. FPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOMR achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly lower than FPRO's 9.97% return.


AOMR

1D
-3.27%
1M
-8.15%
YTD
-0.12%
6M
-3.48%
1Y
2.54%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
10Y*

FPRO

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
9.97%
6M
9.24%
1Y
10.32%
3Y*
9.14%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOMR vs. FPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AOMR
Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc.
-0.12%6.20%-1.89%159.86%-67.27%-9.73%
FPRO
Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF
9.97%2.60%5.63%10.93%-25.02%16.24%

Correlation

The correlation between AOMR and FPRO is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOMR vs. FPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOMR
AOMR Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
AOMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOMR Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AOMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOMR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FPRO
FPRO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOMR vs. FPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOMRFPRODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.11

0.79

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.30

1.15

-0.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.14

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

1.35

-1.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.34

3.88

-3.54

AOMR vs. FPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOMR Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the FPRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOMR and FPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOMRFPRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

0.79

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.35

-0.46

Drawdowns

AOMR vs. FPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOMR drawdown since its inception was -71.21%, which is greater than FPRO's maximum drawdown of -32.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOMR and FPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOMRFPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.21%

-32.81%

-38.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.57%

-7.67%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.21%

-16.83%

-20.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.15%

-2.73%

-18.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.43%

-12.66%

-10.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

2.67%

+4.92%

Volatility

AOMR vs. FPRO - Volatility Comparison

Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc. (AOMR) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) at 3.54%. This indicates that AOMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOMRFPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.69%

3.54%

+4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

9.13%

+6.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.48%

13.10%

+10.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.72%

18.62%

+20.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.72%

18.37%

+20.35%

Dividends

AOMR vs. FPRO - Dividend Comparison

AOMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.04%, more than FPRO's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AOMR
Angel Oak Mortgage, Inc.
16.04%14.87%13.79%12.08%35.31%2.93%
FPRO
Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF
2.57%2.69%2.50%2.83%2.67%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


AOMR and FPRO have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AOMR has higher volatility (7.69%) compared to FPRO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AOMR dropped -71.21% vs FPRO's -32.81%.

FPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOMR and FPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer