AOK vs. ASET
AOK (iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF) and ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - AOK tracks the S&P Target Risk Conservative Index while ASET tracks the Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. Both are passively managed. AOK charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ASET.
Performance
AOK vs. ASET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AOK
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 4.14%
- 1Y
- 12.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 5.14%
ASET
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOK vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF | 2.34% |
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund | 0.00% |
AOK vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AOK
ASET
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AOK
ASET
Financial Services
AOK
ASET
-
Industrials
AOK
ASET
Communication Services
AOK
ASET
Consumer Cyclical
AOK
ASET
Healthcare
AOK
ASET
Consumer Defensive
AOK
ASET
Energy
AOK
ASET
Basic Materials
AOK
ASET
Utilities
AOK
ASET
Real Estate
AOK
ASET
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AOK vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank
AOK
ASET
AOK vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AOK | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.01 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.50 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AOK | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | — | — |
Drawdowns
AOK vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AOK drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOK and ASET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AOK | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | 0.00% | -18.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | 0.00% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | 0.00% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | — | — |
Volatility
AOK vs. ASET - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AOK | ASET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.76% | 0.00% | +5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.10% | 0.00% | +7.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.71% | 0.00% | +6.71% |
AOK vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison
AOK has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
AOK vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison
AOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOK iShares Core Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.28% | 3.28% | 3.23% | 2.93% | 2.25% | 1.55% | 2.10% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 2.91% | 2.14% | 2.02% |
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, AOK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AOK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.
AOK has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.
AOK tracks S&P Target Risk Conservative Index, while ASET tracks Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AOK and 0.57% for ASET.
Find the right allocation for AOK and ASET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer