AOHY vs. EVTR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR).

AOHY and EVTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AOHY is an actively managed fund by Angel Oak. It was launched on Mar 31, 2009. EVTR is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Nov 14, 1984.

Performance

AOHY vs. EVTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AOHY vs. EVTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF	0.49%	7.62%	6.03%
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	-0.22%	8.10%	4.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOHY achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than EVTR's -0.22% return.

AOHY

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -0.64%
• YTD: 0.49%
• 6M: 1.33%
• 1Y: 6.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EVTR

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -1.50%
• YTD: -0.22%
• 6M: 0.78%
• 1Y: 4.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOHY vs. EVTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOHY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EVTR's 0.32% expense ratio.

AOHY

Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF

EVTR

Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF

Return for Risk

AOHY vs. EVTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOHY

AOHY Risk / Return Rank: 80
AOHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
AOHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AOHY Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AOHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
AOHY Martin Ratio Rank: 82

EVTR

EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 63
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 57
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOHY vs. EVTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AOHY	EVTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.24	+0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	1.74	+0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.22	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	1.77	+0.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.01	6.07	+3.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AOHY vs. EVTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the EVTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOHY and EVTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AOHY	EVTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.24	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.94	1.38	+0.56

Correlation

The correlation between AOHY and EVTR is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AOHY vs. EVTR - Dividend Comparison

AOHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than EVTR's 4.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF	6.58%	6.53%	6.04%
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	4.63%	4.51%	4.26%

Drawdowns

AOHY vs. EVTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOHY drawdown since its inception was -4.17%, roughly equal to the maximum EVTR drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOHY and EVTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOHY	EVTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	-4.08%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.55%	-2.85%	-0.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-1.94%	+1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.36%	-0.92%	+0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	0.83%	-0.15%

Volatility

AOHY vs. EVTR - Volatility Comparison

Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) has a higher volatility of 1.93% compared to Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) at 1.66%. This indicates that AOHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOHY	EVTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.93%	1.66%	+0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.56%	2.42%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.43%	3.90%	+0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.83%	4.30%	-0.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.83%	4.30%	-0.47%