PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AOF.DE vs. 1MC.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AOF.DE vs. 1MC.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in ATOSS Software AG (AOF.DE) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOF.DE achieves a -29.33% return, which is significantly lower than 1MC.MI's -23.38% return. Over the past 10 years, AOF.DE has outperformed 1MC.MI with an annualized return of 20.50%, while 1MC.MI has yielded a comparatively lower 14.70% annualized return.


AOF.DE

1D
2.33%
1M
4.21%
YTD
-29.33%
6M
-31.70%
1Y
-40.82%
3Y*
-6.64%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*
20.50%

1MC.MI

1D
1.86%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
-23.38%
6M
-23.56%
1Y
2.08%
3Y*
-14.65%
5Y*
-4.26%
10Y*
14.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOF.DE vs. 1MC.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AOF.DE
ATOSS Software AG
-29.33%2.71%10.76%52.52%-35.00%38.59%136.57%89.49%12.79%43.45%
1MC.MI
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-23.38%1.76%-13.18%10.77%-4.82%43.17%27.08%66.96%4.34%40.50%

Correlation

The correlation between AOF.DE and 1MC.MI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2007

0.17

The correlation between AOF.DE and 1MC.MI shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AOF.DE vs. 1MC.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOF.DE
AOF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
AOF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
AOF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

1MC.MI
1MC.MI Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
1MC.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1MC.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
1MC.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
1MC.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
1MC.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOF.DE vs. 1MC.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATOSS Software AG (AOF.DE) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AOF.DE1MC.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.02

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

-0.06

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

-0.12

-1.16

AOF.DE vs. 1MC.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOF.DE Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the 1MC.MI Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOF.DE and 1MC.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AOF.DE1MC.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.00

-0.05

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.14

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.51

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.39

-0.06

Drawdowns

AOF.DE vs. 1MC.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOF.DE drawdown since its inception was -90.69%, which is greater than 1MC.MI's maximum drawdown of -55.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOF.DE and 1MC.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AOF.DE1MC.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.69%

-55.11%

-35.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.37%

-30.60%

-19.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.37%

-48.21%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.37%

-48.57%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.37%

-48.57%

-1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.60%

-43.22%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.52%

-11.99%

-20.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.21%

15.08%

+16.13%

Volatility

AOF.DE vs. 1MC.MI - Volatility Comparison

ATOSS Software AG (AOF.DE) has a higher volatility of 18.36% compared to LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (1MC.MI) at 8.34%. This indicates that AOF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1MC.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AOF.DE1MC.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.36%

8.34%

+10.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.97%

22.31%

+9.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.23%

33.61%

+6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.73%

30.83%

+4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.06%

28.57%

+8.49%

Dividends

AOF.DE vs. 1MC.MI - Dividend Comparison

AOF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, more than 1MC.MI's 2.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1MC.MI
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.76%2.08%2.07%2.44%1.76%0.96%1.79%1.49%2.14%1.70%2.01%2.23%
AOF.DE
ATOSS Software AG
2.88%1.85%1.48%1.35%1.31%0.77%4.03%2.79%6.67%1.57%5.34%1.28%

Financials

AOF.DE vs. 1MC.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ATOSS Software AG and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AOF.DE and 1MC.MI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AOF.DE and 1MC.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer