AOD vs. CSH2.L

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

AOD (Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund) is a stock, while CSH2.L (Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc) is Money Market fund tracking the SONIA Compounded (GBP Hedged). Over the past 10 years, AOD returned 13.38%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for CSH2.L. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AOD charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSH2.L.

Performance

AOD vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) and Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AOD is traded in USD, while CSH2.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSH2.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AOD achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly higher than CSH2.L's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, AOD has outperformed CSH2.L with an annualized return of 13.38%, while CSH2.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.10% annualized return.

AOD

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 33.31%
• 3Y*: 20.75%
• 5Y*: 10.87%
• 10Y*: 13.38%

CSH2.L

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: -1.18%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 0.82%
• 3Y*: 6.47%
• 5Y*: 2.82%
• 10Y*: 2.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AOD vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund	12.61%	32.14%	16.03%	12.65%	-17.15%	23.80%	8.12%	34.83%	-17.63%	35.37%
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc	0.42%	12.57%	3.85%	10.24%	-9.32%	-0.78%	3.37%	4.86%	-5.00%	9.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AOD and CSH2.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015	0.26

The correlation between AOD and CSH2.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AOD vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOD

AOD Risk / Return Rank: 87
AOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AOD Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
AOD Martin Ratio Rank: 87

CSH2.L

CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AOD vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) and Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AOD	CSH2.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	0.12	+1.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	0.23	+2.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.03	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	0.20	+1.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.59	0.41	+8.18

AOD vs. CSH2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AOD Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AOD and CSH2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AOD vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AOD drawdown since its inception was -72.26%, which is greater than CSH2.L's maximum drawdown of -29.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AOD and CSH2.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AOD	CSH2.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.26%	-29.83%	-42.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.71%	-4.11%	-12.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.71%	-7.81%	-8.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.92%	-22.77%	-6.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.68%	-24.10%	-19.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-2.66%	+0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.20%	-12.65%	-14.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.89%	1.98%	+1.91%

Volatility

AOD vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison

Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) has a higher volatility of 5.22% compared to Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc (CSH2.L) at 1.72%. This indicates that AOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AOD	CSH2.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.22%	1.72%	+3.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.70%	4.96%	+8.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.99%	6.59%	+9.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.77%	8.55%	+8.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.52%	8.88%	+9.64%

AOD vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AOD has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH2.L's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

AOD vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison

AOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.81%, while CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund	11.81%	12.00%	10.73%	8.56%	8.85%	6.75%	7.80%	7.71%	9.57%	7.29%	9.10%	8.93%
CSH2.L Amundi Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AOD and CSH2.L in my portfolio?

AOD and CSH2.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.