PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ANXG.L vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ANXG.L vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ANXG.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ANXG.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ANXG.L returned 22.61%/yr vs 16.37%/yr for VOO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANXG.L charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

ANXG.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ANXG.L is traded in GBp, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANXG.L achieves a 19.88% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, ANXG.L has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 22.61%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 16.37% annualized return.

ANXG.L

1D
-0.64%
1M
9.65%
YTD
19.88%
6M
18.47%
1Y
41.85%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
19.03%
10Y*
22.61%

VOO

1D
0.00%
1M
5.14%
YTD
11.32%
6M
10.03%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANXG.L vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANXG.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD		19.88%11.70%28.70%48.00%-25.42%29.85%43.37%34.20%4.47%20.19%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		11.79%9.43%27.16%20.01%-8.44%30.01%14.85%26.37%1.16%11.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ANXG.L and VOO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.57

The correlation between ANXG.L and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (5 years) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ANXG.L vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ANXG.L
VOO

Technology

53.7%
35.7%

Communication Services

15.8%
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.5%

Industrials

3.1%
8.3%

Utilities

1.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

ANXG.L
53.7%
VOO
35.7%

Communication Services

ANXG.L
15.8%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ANXG.L
12.2%
VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

ANXG.L
7.7%
VOO
4.9%

Healthcare

ANXG.L
4.2%
VOO
8.5%

Industrials

ANXG.L
3.1%
VOO
8.3%

Utilities

ANXG.L
1.4%
VOO
2.4%

Basic Materials

ANXG.L
1.1%
VOO
1.8%

Energy

ANXG.L
0.6%
VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

ANXG.L
0.2%
VOO
11.6%

Real Estate

ANXG.L
0.1%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF

Often compared with ANXG.L:
ANXG.L vs. QQQANXG.L vs. USTANXG.L vs. EQQQ.LANXG.L vs. LGEN.LANXG.L vs. AEDAXANXG.L vs. JUP.LANXG.L vs. EQQQ.DE
Often compared with VOO:
VOO vs. VTIVOO vs. QQQVOO vs. SCHDVOO vs. VTVOO vs. SPYVOO vs. FXAIXVOO vs. IVV

Return for Risk

ANXG.L vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ANXG.L
ANXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANXG.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ANXG.LVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.85
2.57

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.67
3.34

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.48

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.84

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

14.73

-3.78

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANXG.L vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANXG.L and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ANXG.LVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

2.57

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.96

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

0.91

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.95

+0.23

Drawdowns

ANXG.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANXG.L drawdown since its inception was -27.69%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANXG.L and VOO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ANXG.LVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.69%

-26.09%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-7.66%

-3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.54%

-21.93%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.69%

-21.93%

-5.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.69%

-26.09%

-1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-0.44%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.35%

-3.30%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

2.00%

+1.81%

Volatility

ANXG.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.68%. This indicates that ANXG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ANXG.LVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

2.68%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.39%

8.17%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.62%

11.46%

+3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

15.77%

+3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.31%

18.10%

+1.21%

ANXG.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANXG.L has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ANXG.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ANXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANXG.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF		1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

ANXG.L and VOO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for ANXG.L.

ANXG.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VOO is S&P 500. ANXG.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for ANXG.L and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANXG.L and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer