ANV vs. ACYS
ANV (GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ANV charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
ANV vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ANV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ANV vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ANV GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF | 3.06% |
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 1.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANV and ACYS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANV vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF (ANV) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANV vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANV drawdown since its inception was -2.82%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANV and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANV | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -0.63% | -2.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -0.34% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -0.14% | -0.45% |
Volatility
ANV vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANV | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.30% | 3.36% | +6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 3.36% | +6.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 3.36% | +6.94% |
ANV vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANV has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANV vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
ANV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, more than ACYS's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.61% |
ANV GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF | 6.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANV and ACYS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for ANV.
ANV has the higher dividend yield at 6.98%, compared with 0.61% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for ANV and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for ANV and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer