PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANOIX vs. RYWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANOIX vs. RYWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Small Cap Growth Fund (ANOIX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANOIX achieves a 17.86% return, which is significantly lower than RYWCX's 26.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ANOIX has outperformed RYWCX with an annualized return of 14.73%, while RYWCX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.32% annualized return.


ANOIX

1D
1.19%
1M
7.70%
YTD
17.86%
6M
14.80%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
14.73%

RYWCX

1D
-0.02%
1M
8.58%
YTD
26.14%
6M
22.20%
1Y
37.61%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
8.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANOIX vs. RYWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANOIX
American Century Small Cap Growth Fund
17.86%9.00%14.90%17.13%-26.41%7.80%51.07%36.75%-4.84%25.83%
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
26.14%7.76%7.20%17.03%-30.33%16.37%15.23%11.58%-9.55%15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between ANOIX and RYWCX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.93

The correlation between ANOIX and RYWCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANOIX vs. RYWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANOIX
ANOIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ANOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ANOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

RYWCX
RYWCX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RYWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RYWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANOIX vs. RYWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Small Cap Growth Fund (ANOIX) and Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANOIXRYWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

4.68

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.83

15.45

-6.62

ANOIX vs. RYWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANOIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the RYWCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANOIX and RYWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANOIX vs. RYWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANOIX drawdown since its inception was -59.47%, roughly equal to the maximum RYWCX drawdown of -60.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANOIX and RYWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANOIXRYWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.47%

-60.64%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-8.49%

-4.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.57%

-26.39%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.15%

-40.28%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.07%

-54.65%

+15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.97%

-13.42%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

2.57%

+0.76%

Volatility

ANOIX vs. RYWCX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Small Cap Growth Fund (ANOIX) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund (RYWCX) at 5.56%. This indicates that ANOIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANOIXRYWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

5.56%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.95%

13.92%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.71%

18.79%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.08%

22.93%

+0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.37%

24.75%

-1.38%

ANOIX vs. RYWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANOIX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than RYWCX's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANOIX vs. RYWCX - Dividend Comparison

ANOIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.45%, while RYWCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANOIX
American Century Small Cap Growth Fund
6.45%7.60%0.11%0.00%0.00%21.29%11.07%5.50%16.59%3.93%
RYWCX
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.52%0.00%0.00%59.93%0.00%0.00%9.26%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ANOIX and RYWCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANOIX has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to RYWCX (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANOIX dropped -59.47% vs RYWCX's -60.64%.

RYWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANOIX and RYWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer