PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANNPX vs. PCONX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANNPX vs. PCONX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) and Putnam Convertible Securities Fund (PCONX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANNPX achieves a 21.91% return, which is significantly lower than PCONX's 23.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ANNPX has outperformed PCONX with an annualized return of 14.60%, while PCONX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.97% annualized return.


ANNPX

1D
1.01%
1M
6.09%
YTD
21.91%
6M
21.76%
1Y
45.57%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
14.60%

PCONX

1D
1.30%
1M
6.85%
YTD
23.89%
6M
23.82%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
18.15%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
11.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANNPX vs. PCONX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
21.91%22.50%14.13%8.39%-18.65%4.96%55.99%26.45%2.76%15.22%
PCONX
Putnam Convertible Securities Fund
23.89%11.97%12.60%10.13%-19.27%4.23%44.86%24.32%-2.92%14.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ANNPX and PCONX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 1993

0.91

The correlation between ANNPX and PCONX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANNPX vs. PCONX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANNPX
ANNPX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ANNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ANNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PCONX
PCONX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PCONX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCONX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCONX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PCONX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCONX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANNPX vs. PCONX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) and Putnam Convertible Securities Fund (PCONX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANNPXPCONXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.44

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.50

4.83

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.78

17.01

+11.77

ANNPX vs. PCONX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANNPX Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the PCONX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANNPX and PCONX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANNPXPCONXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33

2.51

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.60

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

0.92

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.68

-0.13

Drawdowns

ANNPX vs. PCONX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANNPX drawdown since its inception was -55.61%, which is greater than PCONX's maximum drawdown of -47.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANNPX and PCONX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANNPXPCONXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.61%

-47.70%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-7.35%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.67%

-13.41%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-25.48%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.36%

-26.14%

-1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-8.29%

-9.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.08%

-0.47%

Volatility

ANNPX vs. PCONX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Convertible Fund (ANNPX) is 4.58%, while Putnam Convertible Securities Fund (PCONX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that ANNPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCONX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANNPXPCONXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

5.27%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

11.83%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

14.17%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.84%

12.64%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.59%

13.03%

+0.56%

ANNPX vs. PCONX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANNPX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than PCONX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANNPX vs. PCONX - Dividend Comparison

ANNPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, more than PCONX's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANNPX
Virtus Convertible Fund
9.23%11.32%2.31%2.56%1.55%20.74%6.94%5.12%18.79%23.47%2.88%10.63%
PCONX
Putnam Convertible Securities Fund
4.43%6.10%1.48%0.99%0.72%26.98%11.62%7.72%13.92%3.48%2.08%6.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ANNPX and PCONX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PCONX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to ANNPX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANNPX dropped -55.61% vs PCONX's -47.70%.

ANNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANNPX and PCONX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer