ANGL vs. USHY
ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) and USHY (iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - ANGL tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index while USHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANGL returned 3.44%/yr vs 4.24%/yr for USHY. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ANGL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USHY.
Performance
ANGL vs. USHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANGL achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than USHY's 1.42% return.
ANGL
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.27%
USHY
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 7.02%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- —
ANGL vs. USHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 9.04% | 6.06% | 12.52% | -14.26% | 6.84% | 13.20% | 18.06% | -5.84% | 0.50% |
USHY iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.42% | 8.81% | 8.45% | 12.73% | -11.18% | 5.02% | 6.17% | 14.24% | -2.41% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANGL and USHY is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ANGL and USHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
ANGL vs. USHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ANGL
USHY
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
ANGL
USHY
-
Basic Materials
ANGL
-
USHY
-
Communication Services
ANGL
-
USHY
-
Consumer Cyclical
ANGL
-
USHY
-
Consumer Defensive
ANGL
-
USHY
-
Energy
ANGL
-
USHY
Healthcare
ANGL
-
USHY
-
Industrials
ANGL
-
USHY
-
Real Estate
ANGL
-
USHY
Technology
ANGL
-
USHY
-
Utilities
ANGL
-
USHY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANGL vs. USHY — Risk / Return Rank
ANGL
USHY
ANGL vs. USHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANGL | USHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 2.90 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 13.03 | -4.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANGL | USHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.93 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.58 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.58 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
ANGL vs. USHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, which is greater than USHY's maximum drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and USHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANGL | USHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.31% | -22.44% | -6.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -2.43% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.48% | -4.66% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.25% | -15.56% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.27% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -2.67% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 0.54% | +0.42% |
Volatility
ANGL vs. USHY - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (USHY) at 1.13%. This indicates that ANGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANGL | USHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 1.13% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.46% | 2.91% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 3.65% | +0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.63% | 7.34% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 8.25% | +1.03% |
ANGL vs. USHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANGL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than USHY's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANGL vs. USHY - Dividend Comparison
ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than USHY's 6.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.37% | 6.20% | 6.29% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.19% | 5.99% | 5.25% | 5.34% | 5.81% |
USHY iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.92% | 6.79% | 6.89% | 6.63% | 6.08% | 5.07% | 5.30% | 5.92% | 6.30% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, ANGL and USHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ANGL has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to USHY (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs USHY's -22.44%.
On 5-year performance, USHY leads with 4.24% vs 3.44% for ANGL. On fees, USHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USHY has performed better with a 4.24% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ANGL.
USHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 6.37% for ANGL.
ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while USHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ANGL and 0.15% for USHY.
USHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANGL and USHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer