ANGL vs. MOAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ANGL is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ANGL returned 6.27%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for MOAT. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANGL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for MOAT.

Performance

ANGL vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANGL achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ANGL has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 6.27%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.

ANGL

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 8.16%
• 3Y*: 8.46%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: 6.27%

MOAT

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: -0.94%
• 6M: -0.69%
• 1Y: 14.97%
• 3Y*: 11.34%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: 13.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANGL vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	1.55%	9.04%	6.06%	12.52%	-14.26%	6.84%	13.20%	18.06%	-5.84%	9.71%
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	-0.94%	13.20%	10.73%	31.89%	-13.66%	24.12%	14.84%	34.79%	-1.28%	23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ANGL and MOAT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2012	0.51

The correlation between ANGL and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ANGL vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ANGL	MOAT
Financial Services	100.0%	6.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	17.5%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	16.0%
Industrials	-	13.5%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Technology	-	32.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ANGL vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANGL

ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 52
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 50

MOAT

MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 27
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANGL vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANGL	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.09	+0.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	1.64	+1.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.19	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	1.21	+0.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.49	3.77	+4.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANGL vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANGL and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANGL	MOAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	1.09	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.44	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.72	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.77	-0.03

Drawdowns

ANGL vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and MOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANGL	MOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.31%	-33.31%	+4.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.05%	-12.43%	+8.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.48%	-21.44%	+15.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.25%	-23.96%	+4.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.31%	-33.31%	+4.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-4.72%	+4.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-3.83%	+0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	3.98%	-3.02%

Volatility

ANGL vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) is 1.37%, while VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that ANGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANGL	MOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	3.82%	-2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.46%	9.87%	-6.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.31%	13.86%	-9.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.63%	18.18%	-10.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.28%	18.68%	-9.40%

ANGL vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANGL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANGL vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than MOAT's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	6.37%	6.20%	6.29%	5.27%	4.72%	3.90%	4.67%	5.19%	5.99%	5.25%	5.34%	5.81%
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF	1.37%	1.36%	1.37%	0.86%	1.25%	1.08%	1.46%	1.31%	1.79%	1.07%	1.17%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANGL and MOAT in my portfolio?

ANGL and MOAT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ANGL or MOAT?

MOAT has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to ANGL (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

Which ETF is better, ANGL or MOAT?

On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.37% vs 6.27% for ANGL. On fees, ANGL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ANGL or MOAT?

Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.37% return vs 6.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ANGL or MOAT?

ANGL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for MOAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ANGL or MOAT?

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 1.37% for MOAT.

What is the main difference between ANGL and MOAT?

ANGL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ANGL and 0.48% for MOAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.