ANGL vs. IBHE
ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) and IBHE (iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - ANGL tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index while IBHE tracks the Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANGL returned 3.44%/yr vs 3.89%/yr for IBHE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
ANGL vs. IBHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ANGL
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.27%
IBHE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 2.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
ANGL vs. IBHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 9.04% | 6.06% | 12.52% | -14.26% | 6.84% | 13.20% | 7.19% |
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 0.00% | 4.45% | 7.62% | 10.32% | -4.08% | 4.40% | 4.16% | 5.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANGL and IBHE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ANGL and IBHE has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ANGL vs. IBHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ANGL
IBHE
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
ANGL
IBHE
-
Basic Materials
ANGL
-
IBHE
-
Communication Services
ANGL
-
IBHE
-
Consumer Cyclical
ANGL
-
IBHE
-
Consumer Defensive
ANGL
-
IBHE
-
Energy
ANGL
-
IBHE
-
Healthcare
ANGL
-
IBHE
-
Industrials
ANGL
-
IBHE
-
Real Estate
ANGL
-
IBHE
Technology
ANGL
-
IBHE
-
Utilities
ANGL
-
IBHE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANGL vs. IBHE — Risk / Return Rank
ANGL
IBHE
ANGL vs. IBHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANGL | IBHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 2.19 | -0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 12.78 | -10.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 63.40 | -54.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANGL | IBHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 3.51 | -1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.83 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.41 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
ANGL vs. IBHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, which is greater than IBHE's maximum drawdown of -26.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and IBHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANGL | IBHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.31% | -26.91% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -0.22% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.48% | -0.94% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.25% | -8.51% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | 0.00% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -1.42% | -1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 0.05% | +0.91% |
Volatility
ANGL vs. IBHE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) at 0.00%. This indicates that ANGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANGL | IBHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 0.00% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.46% | 0.39% | +3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 0.78% | +3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.63% | 4.87% | +2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 11.53% | -2.25% |
ANGL vs. IBHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ANGL and IBHE have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
ANGL vs. IBHE - Dividend Comparison
ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than IBHE's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.37% | 6.20% | 6.29% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.19% | 5.99% | 5.25% | 5.34% | 5.81% |
IBHE iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 2.29% | 4.53% | 6.92% | 7.17% | 5.77% | 4.84% | 5.74% | 3.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANGL and IBHE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANGL has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to IBHE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs IBHE's -26.91%.
On 5-year performance, IBHE leads with 3.89% vs 3.44% for ANGL. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, IBHE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBHE has performed better with a 3.89% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ANGL and IBHE have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 2.29% for IBHE.
ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while IBHE tracks Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares.
IBHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANGL and IBHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer