PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANGL vs. IBHE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANGL vs. IBHE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ANGL

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.64%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
6.27%

IBHE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.09%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
6.07%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANGL vs. IBHE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
1.55%9.04%6.06%12.52%-14.26%6.84%13.20%7.19%
IBHE
iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF
0.00%4.45%7.62%10.32%-4.08%4.40%4.16%5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ANGL and IBHE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between ANGL and IBHE has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ANGL vs. IBHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ANGL
IBHE

Financial Services

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

100.0%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

ANGL
100.0%
IBHE

-

Basic Materials

ANGL

-

IBHE

-

Communication Services

ANGL

-

IBHE

-

Consumer Cyclical

ANGL

-

IBHE

-

Consumer Defensive

ANGL

-

IBHE

-

Energy

ANGL

-

IBHE

-

Healthcare

ANGL

-

IBHE

-

Industrials

ANGL

-

IBHE

-

Real Estate

ANGL

-

IBHE
100.0%

Technology

ANGL

-

IBHE

-

Utilities

ANGL

-

IBHE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANGL vs. IBHE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANGL
ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

IBHE
IBHE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IBHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHE Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANGL vs. IBHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANGLIBHEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

2.19

-0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

12.78

-10.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

63.40

-54.91

ANGL vs. IBHE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the IBHE Sharpe Ratio of 3.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANGL and IBHE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANGLIBHEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

3.51

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.83

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.41

+0.33

Drawdowns

ANGL vs. IBHE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, which is greater than IBHE's maximum drawdown of -26.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and IBHE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANGLIBHEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.31%

-26.91%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.05%

-0.22%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.48%

-0.94%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.25%

-8.51%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

0.00%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-1.42%

-1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.05%

+0.91%

Volatility

ANGL vs. IBHE - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHE) at 0.00%. This indicates that ANGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANGLIBHEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

0.00%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.46%

0.39%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

0.78%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.63%

4.87%

+2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.28%

11.53%

-2.25%

ANGL vs. IBHE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ANGL and IBHE have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

ANGL vs. IBHE - Dividend Comparison

ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than IBHE's 2.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
6.37%6.20%6.29%5.27%4.72%3.90%4.67%5.19%5.99%5.25%5.34%5.81%
IBHE
iShares iBonds 2025 Term High Yield & Income ETF
2.29%4.53%6.92%7.17%5.77%4.84%5.74%3.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANGL and IBHE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANGL has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to IBHE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs IBHE's -26.91%.

On 5-year performance, IBHE leads with 3.89% vs 3.44% for ANGL. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, IBHE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IBHE has performed better with a 3.89% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ANGL and IBHE have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 2.29% for IBHE.

ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while IBHE tracks Bloomberg 2025 Term High Yield and Income Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares.

IBHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.51 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANGL and IBHE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer