ANGL vs. ESHY
ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) and ESHY (Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - ANGL tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index while ESHY tracks the JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. Both are passively managed. ANGL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ESHY.
Performance
ANGL vs. ESHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ANGL
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.27%
ESHY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANGL vs. ESHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 0.54% |
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% |
ANGL vs. ESHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ANGL
ESHY
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
ANGL
ESHY
-
Basic Materials
ANGL
-
ESHY
-
Communication Services
ANGL
-
ESHY
-
Consumer Cyclical
ANGL
-
ESHY
-
Consumer Defensive
ANGL
-
ESHY
-
Energy
ANGL
-
ESHY
Healthcare
ANGL
-
ESHY
-
Industrials
ANGL
-
ESHY
-
Real Estate
ANGL
-
ESHY
-
Technology
ANGL
-
ESHY
-
Utilities
ANGL
-
ESHY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANGL vs. ESHY — Risk / Return Rank
ANGL
ESHY
ANGL vs. ESHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANGL | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANGL | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ANGL vs. ESHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, which is greater than ESHY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and ESHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANGL | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.31% | 0.00% | -29.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | 0.00% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | 0.00% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | — | — |
Volatility
ANGL vs. ESHY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANGL | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 0.00% | +4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.63% | 0.00% | +7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 0.00% | +9.28% |
ANGL vs. ESHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANGL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ESHY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANGL vs. ESHY - Dividend Comparison
ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, while ESHY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.37% | 6.20% | 6.29% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.19% | 5.99% | 5.25% | 5.34% | 5.81% |
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ESHY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESHY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ANGL.
ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 0.00% for ESHY.
ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while ESHY tracks JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ANGL and 0.20% for ESHY.
Find the right allocation for ANGL and ESHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer