ANGL vs. DADS
ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. ANGL is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANGL charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
ANGL vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANGL achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 14.37% return.
ANGL
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.27%
DADS
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANGL vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 3.71% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 14.37% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANGL and DADS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANGL vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
ANGL
DADS
ANGL vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANGL | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.73 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANGL | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.73 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
ANGL vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, which is greater than DADS's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANGL | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.31% | -17.07% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -2.77% | +2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -7.63% | +4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | — | — |
Volatility
ANGL vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANGL | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 17.58% | -13.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.63% | 17.58% | -9.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.28% | 17.58% | -8.30% |
ANGL vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANGL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANGL vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than DADS's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.37% | 6.20% | 6.29% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.19% | 5.99% | 5.25% | 5.34% | 5.81% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.76% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANGL and DADS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANGL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANGL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
ANGL has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 2.76% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ANGL and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for ANGL and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer