ANGL vs. BITI
ANGL (VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ANGL is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ANGL returned 7.97%/yr vs -31.62%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. ANGL charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
ANGL vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANGL achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.
ANGL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.03%
- 10Y*
- 5.82%
BITI
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 35.86%
- YTD
- 24.48%
- 1Y
- 64.61%
- 3Y*
- -31.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANGL vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 2.25% | 9.04% | 6.06% | 12.52% | 2.45% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 24.48% | -1.76% | -62.60% | -66.17% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANGL and BITI is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022 | -0.30 |
The correlation between ANGL and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.39 (1 year) to -0.29 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANGL vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
ANGL
BITI
ANGL vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANGL | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 2.57 | -0.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 6.38 | +0.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANGL vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANGL | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.31% | -92.16% | +62.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -25.28% | +21.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.48% | -84.63% | +79.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -86.41% | +86.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -68.40% | +65.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 10.16% | -9.20% |
Volatility
ANGL vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) is 0.80%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that ANGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANGL | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.80% | 10.76% | -9.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.58% | 34.28% | -30.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.30% | 44.15% | -39.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.64% | 52.24% | -44.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.23% | 52.24% | -43.01% |
ANGL vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANGL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANGL vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, less than BITI's 15.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.46% | 6.20% | 6.29% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.19% | 5.99% | 5.25% | 5.34% | 5.81% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 15.62% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANGL and BITI have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITI has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to ANGL (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 3-year performance, ANGL leads with 7.97% vs -31.62% for BITI. On fees, ANGL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ANGL has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ANGL has performed better with a 7.97% return vs -31.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ANGL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.62%, compared with 6.46% for ANGL.
ANGL is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. ANGL tracks ICE US Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ANGL and 1.03% for BITI.
ANGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ANGL and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer