ANGL vs. BBHY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - ANGL tracks the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index while BBHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ANGL returned 3.44%/yr vs 4.09%/yr for BBHY. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ANGL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBHY.

Performance

ANGL vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ANGL having a 1.55% return and BBHY slightly higher at 1.58%.

ANGL

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 8.16%
• 3Y*: 8.46%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: 6.27%

BBHY

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.96%
• 1Y: 7.15%
• 3Y*: 8.61%
• 5Y*: 4.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANGL vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	1.55%	9.04%	6.06%	12.52%	-14.26%	6.84%	13.20%	18.06%	-5.84%	9.71%
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.58%	8.51%	7.81%	11.98%	-10.37%	3.88%	5.36%	14.35%	-2.50%	6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ANGL and BBHY is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016	0.81

The correlation between ANGL and BBHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ANGL vs. BBHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ANGL	BBHY
Financial Services	100.0%	4.1%
Basic Materials	-	3.2%
Communication Services	-	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.5%
Energy	-	5.2%
Healthcare	-	5.4%
Industrials	-	8.4%
Real Estate	-	3.9%
Technology	-	4.0%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

ANGL vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANGL

ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 52
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 50

BBHY

BBHY Risk / Return Rank: 63
BBHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BBHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BBHY Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BBHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
BBHY Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANGL vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANGL	BBHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.98	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	3.01	-0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.39	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	3.02	-1.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.49	13.58	-5.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANGL vs. BBHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the BBHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANGL and BBHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANGL	BBHY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	1.98	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.57	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.64	+0.10

Drawdowns

ANGL vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANGL drawdown since its inception was -29.31%, which is greater than BBHY's maximum drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANGL and BBHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANGL	BBHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.31%	-24.98%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.05%	-2.37%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.48%	-5.00%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.25%	-15.32%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-0.30%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-2.37%	-0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	0.53%	+0.43%

Volatility

ANGL vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) at 1.12%. This indicates that ANGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANGL	BBHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	1.12%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.46%	2.86%	+0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.31%	3.62%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.63%	7.26%	+0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.28%	7.53%	+1.75%

ANGL vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANGL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANGL vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison

ANGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, less than BBHY's 6.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF	6.37%	6.20%	6.29%	5.27%	4.72%	3.90%	4.67%	5.19%	5.99%	5.25%	5.34%	5.81%
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	6.95%	7.24%	7.18%	6.49%	5.92%	4.06%	4.73%	4.99%	5.02%	4.81%	1.42%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANGL and BBHY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, ANGL and BBHY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ANGL or BBHY?

ANGL has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to BBHY (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANGL dropped -29.31% vs BBHY's -24.98%.

Which ETF is better, ANGL or BBHY?

On 5-year performance, BBHY leads with 4.09% vs 3.44% for ANGL. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BBHY has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ANGL or BBHY?

Over the 5-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 4.09% return vs 3.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ANGL or BBHY?

BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ANGL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ANGL or BBHY?

BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.95%, compared with 6.37% for ANGL.

What is the main difference between ANGL and BBHY?

ANGL tracks BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index, while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ANGL and 0.15% for BBHY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.