ANFFX vs. EPGCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ANFFX (American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1) and EPGCX (Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ANFFX returned 16.32%/yr vs 16.08%/yr for EPGCX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ANFFX charges 0.78%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for EPGCX.

Performance

ANFFX vs. EPGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C (EPGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANFFX achieves a 22.83% return, which is significantly higher than EPGCX's 14.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ANFFX having a 16.32% annualized return and EPGCX not far behind at 16.08%.

ANFFX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 11.90%
• YTD: 22.83%
• 6M: 25.77%
• 1Y: 55.61%
• 3Y*: 30.63%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: 16.32%

EPGCX

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 6.80%
• YTD: 14.52%
• 6M: 13.79%
• 1Y: 29.84%
• 3Y*: 17.48%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: 16.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANFFX vs. EPGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANFFX American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1	22.83%	30.96%	23.52%	29.10%	-29.69%	11.98%	33.43%	26.38%	-4.41%	34.27%
EPGCX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C	14.52%	13.38%	9.87%	34.16%	-25.24%	21.72%	42.18%	32.59%	-0.65%	33.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ANFFX and EPGCX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2001	0.93

The correlation between ANFFX and EPGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ANFFX vs. EPGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANFFX

ANFFX Risk / Return Rank: 89
ANFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ANFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
ANFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ANFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ANFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

EPGCX

EPGCX Risk / Return Rank: 39
EPGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
EPGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
EPGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
EPGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
EPGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANFFX vs. EPGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX) and Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C (EPGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANFFX	EPGCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.32	1.89	+1.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.14	2.56	+1.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.34	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.24	2.35	+1.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	19.03	8.86	+10.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANFFX vs. EPGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANFFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.32, which is higher than the EPGCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANFFX and EPGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANFFX	EPGCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.32	1.89	+1.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	0.47	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.76	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.46	+0.07

Drawdowns

ANFFX vs. EPGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANFFX drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, smaller than the maximum EPGCX drawdown of -65.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANFFX and EPGCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANFFX	EPGCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.37%	-65.66%	+10.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.36%	-12.92%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.81%	-33.74%	+12.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.10%	-33.74%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.10%	-33.74%	-3.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-17.96%	+6.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	3.43%	-0.45%

Volatility

ANFFX vs. EPGCX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1 (ANFFX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C (EPGCX) at 4.17%. This indicates that ANFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPGCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANFFX	EPGCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.27%	4.17%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.72%	12.73%	+0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.22%	16.34%	+0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.39%	21.27%	-1.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.11%	21.11%	-2.00%

ANFFX vs. EPGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANFFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than EPGCX's 1.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANFFX vs. EPGCX - Dividend Comparison

ANFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, more than EPGCX's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANFFX American Funds The New Economy Fund Class F-1	8.06%	9.90%	9.56%	3.89%	0.00%	7.53%	2.45%	7.26%	9.84%	8.19%	2.13%	6.07%
EPGCX Fidelity Advisor Equity Growth Fund Class C	0.77%	0.88%	0.00%	0.75%	2.99%	15.94%	14.57%	11.69%	8.45%	13.66%	7.31%	2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANFFX and EPGCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, ANFFX and EPGCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ANFFX or EPGCX?

ANFFX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to EPGCX (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANFFX dropped -55.37% vs EPGCX's -65.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.