ANEW vs. UPRO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO).

ANEW and UPRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ANEW is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Global Transformational Changes Index. It was launched on Oct 14, 2020. UPRO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index (300%). It was launched on Jun 23, 2009. Both ANEW and UPRO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ANEW vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ANEW vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ANEW ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF	-9.57%	12.01%	19.37%	22.81%	-29.62%	6.95%	5.77%
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500	-16.03%	31.88%	63.57%	68.53%	-56.84%	98.64%	23.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANEW achieves a -9.57% return, which is significantly higher than UPRO's -16.03% return.

ANEW

• 1D: 2.55%
• 1M: -7.97%
• YTD: -9.57%
• 6M: -11.88%
• 1Y: 1.68%
• 3Y*: 10.10%
• 5Y*: 1.75%
• 10Y*: —

UPRO

• 1D: 8.61%
• 1M: -15.71%
• YTD: -16.03%
• 6M: -12.57%
• 1Y: 32.51%
• 3Y*: 37.29%
• 5Y*: 16.63%
• 10Y*: 25.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANEW vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANEW has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than UPRO's 0.92% expense ratio.

UPRO

ProShares UltraPro S&P 500

ANEW

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF

Return for Risk

ANEW vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANEW

ANEW Risk / Return Rank: 14
ANEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
ANEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
ANEW Omega Ratio Rank: 14
ANEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
ANEW Martin Ratio Rank: 14

UPRO

UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 45
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANEW vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANEW	UPRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	0.60	-0.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.27	1.18	-0.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.18	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.10	1.04	-0.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.35	4.18	-3.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANEW vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANEW Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANEW and UPRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANEW	UPRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09	0.60	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	0.33	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.59	-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between ANEW and UPRO is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ANEW vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

ANEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than UPRO's 1.04% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANEW ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF	0.69%	0.54%	1.08%	0.87%	1.05%	0.24%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500	1.04%	0.84%	0.93%	0.74%	0.52%	0.06%	0.11%	0.41%	0.63%	0.00%	0.12%	0.34%

Drawdowns

ANEW vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANEW drawdown since its inception was -39.87%, smaller than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEW and UPRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANEW	UPRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.87%	-76.82%	+36.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.12%	-33.38%	+17.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.87%	-63.94%	+24.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.98%	-20.48%	+6.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.56%	-14.53%	+0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.83%	8.33%	-3.50%

Volatility

ANEW vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) is 5.53%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 15.89%. This indicates that ANEW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANEW	UPRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.53%	15.89%	-10.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.29%	28.41%	-18.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.55%	54.34%	-35.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.85%	50.34%	-31.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.95%	53.70%	-34.75%