PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANET vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANET vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANET achieves a 26.70% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ANET has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 42.93%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.


ANET

1D
-4.79%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
26.70%
6M
29.14%
1Y
74.86%
3Y*
59.83%
5Y*
49.95%
10Y*
42.93%

BIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANET vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
26.70%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%97.89%42.86%-3.46%-10.56%143.44%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.49%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ANET and BIL is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2014

0.00

The correlation between ANET and BIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANET vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANET vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANETBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-18.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-172.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

87.91

-86.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

355.35

-352.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.57

2,817.77

-2,812.20

ANET vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANET Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANET and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANETBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

19.71

-18.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

13.15

-12.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

8.51

-7.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

2.78

-1.93

Drawdowns

ANET vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANET drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANET and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANETBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.20%

-0.78%

-51.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.33%

-0.01%

-28.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.42%

-0.01%

-50.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.42%

-0.10%

-50.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.20%

-0.21%

-51.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.59%

0.00%

-6.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.40%

-0.26%

-15.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.48%

0.00%

+13.48%

Volatility

ANET vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a higher volatility of 21.64% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that ANET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANETBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.64%

0.06%

+21.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.68%

0.13%

+39.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.88%

0.20%

+52.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.09%

0.26%

+46.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.91%

0.26%

+44.65%

Dividends

ANET vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANET and BIL have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANET has higher volatility (21.64%) compared to BIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANET dropped -52.20% vs BIL's -0.78%.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANET and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer