PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANET vs. ALMU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ANET vs. ALMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANET achieves a 24.58% return, which is significantly lower than ALMU's 46.77% return.


ANET

1D
4.37%
1M
14.98%
YTD
24.58%
6M
30.84%
1Y
76.76%
3Y*
57.04%
5Y*
48.31%
10Y*
43.12%

ALMU

1D
1.45%
1M
1.37%
YTD
46.77%
6M
38.84%
1Y
88.27%
3Y*
113.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANET vs. ALMU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
24.58%18.55%87.73%94.07%-8.52%
ALMU
Aeluma, Inc
46.77%124.44%163.79%38.10%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ANET and ALMU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2022

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ANET:

$207.94B

ALMU:

$437.33M

EPS

ANET:

$2.92

ALMU:

-$0.36

PS Ratio

ANET:

21.42

ALMU:

81.48

PB Ratio

ANET:

15.42

ALMU:

10.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

ANET:

$9.71B

ALMU:

$5.20M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ANET:

$6.17B

ALMU:

$2.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

ANET:

$4.21B

ALMU:

-$6.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANET vs. ALMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ALMU
ALMU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ALMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALMU Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ALMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALMU Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANET vs. ALMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) and Aeluma, Inc (ALMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ANETALMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

0.85

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

1.62

+3.58

ANET vs. ALMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANET Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the ALMU Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANET and ALMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ANET vs. ALMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANET drawdown since its inception was -52.20%, smaller than the maximum ALMU drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANET and ALMU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANETALMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.20%

-55.37%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.33%

-55.37%

+27.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.42%

-55.37%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.15%

-19.97%

+11.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.39%

-23.50%

+8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.60%

29.25%

-15.65%

Volatility

ANET vs. ALMU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) is 16.62%, while Aeluma, Inc (ALMU) has a volatility of 44.76%. This indicates that ANET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANETALMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.62%

44.76%

-28.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.79%

95.20%

-54.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.57%

130.67%

-77.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.23%

123.75%

-76.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.00%

123.75%

-78.75%

Dividends

ANET vs. ALMU - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANET nor ALMU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ANET vs. ALMU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arista Networks, Inc. and Aeluma, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.71B
1.22M
(ANET) Total Revenue
(ALMU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ANET and ALMU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALMU has higher volatility (44.76%) compared to ANET (16.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANET dropped -52.20% vs ALMU's -55.37%.

ANET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANET and ALMU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer