ANEL vs. XDSQ
ANEL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ANEL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
ANEL vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANEL achieves a 41.13% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's 4.06% return.
ANEL
- 1D
- 11.82%
- 1M
- 21.44%
- 6M
- 24.42%
- YTD
- 41.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 14.72%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 9.46%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $872.88K | $2.81M | $5.68M | |
| $337.95K | $898.70K | $479.40K |
ANEL vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ANEL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF | 41.13% | -22.70% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 4.06% | 6.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANEL and XDSQ is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANEL vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
ANEL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XDSQ
ANEL vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF (ANEL) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ANEL | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ANEL vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANEL drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEL and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANEL | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -26.06% | -30.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.74% | -0.31% | -12.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.34% | -4.83% | -22.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
ANEL vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANEL | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.69% | 10.98% | +99.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.69% | 15.29% | +95.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.69% | 14.95% | +95.74% |
ANEL vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANEL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANEL vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANEL nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANEL and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for ANEL.
ANEL and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for ANEL and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for ANEL and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer