ANEL vs. COTG
ANEL (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. ANEL charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
ANEL vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANEL achieves a 30.41% return, which is significantly higher than COTG's 20.04% return.
ANEL
- 1D
- -10.20%
- 1M
- -10.70%
- YTD
- 30.41%
- 6M
- 32.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- 20.04%
- 6M
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANEL vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ANEL Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF | 30.41% | -27.10% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 20.04% | -21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANEL and COTG is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANEL vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ANET ETF (ANEL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANEL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | -0.21 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
ANEL vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANEL drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANEL and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANEL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -25.69% | -30.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -21.71% | +2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.90% | -8.42% | -20.48% |
Volatility
ANEL vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANEL | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.46% | 40.63% | +66.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 107.46% | 40.63% | +66.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.46% | 40.63% | +66.83% |
ANEL vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANEL has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ANEL vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither ANEL nor COTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ANEL and COTG have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for ANEL.
ANEL and COTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for ANEL and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for ANEL and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer