PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANCFX vs. GFFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANCFX vs. GFFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANCFX achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly higher than GFFFX's 10.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ANCFX has underperformed GFFFX with an annualized return of 14.90%, while GFFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.22% annualized return.


ANCFX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.89%
YTD
15.14%
6M
16.14%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
26.09%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
14.90%

GFFFX

1D
-0.32%
1M
6.84%
YTD
10.19%
6M
9.81%
1Y
26.45%
3Y*
25.40%
5Y*
12.74%
10Y*
16.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANCFX vs. GFFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANCFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A
15.14%24.21%22.73%25.86%-16.66%22.43%14.92%27.07%-8.13%22.80%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America
10.19%19.96%28.28%37.51%-30.61%19.55%38.16%28.43%-2.96%26.38%

Correlation

The correlation between ANCFX and GFFFX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009

0.96

The correlation between ANCFX and GFFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANCFX vs. GFFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANCFX
ANCFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ANCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ANCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GFFFX
GFFFX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GFFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GFFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANCFX vs. GFFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANCFXGFFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.32

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

1.97

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.41

7.70

+7.71

ANCFX vs. GFFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANCFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the GFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANCFX and GFFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANCFXGFFFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

1.79

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.63

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.83

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.81

-0.17

Drawdowns

ANCFX vs. GFFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANCFX drawdown since its inception was -53.29%, which is greater than GFFFX's maximum drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANCFX and GFFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANCFXGFFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.29%

-36.26%

-17.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-13.74%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.97%

-21.55%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.07%

-36.26%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.93%

-36.26%

+2.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.32%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-5.57%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.51%

-1.21%

Volatility

ANCFX vs. GFFFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANCFXGFFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

3.67%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.82%

11.66%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

15.16%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

20.25%

-3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.73%

19.69%

-1.96%

ANCFX vs. GFFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANCFX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GFFFX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ANCFX vs. GFFFX - Dividend Comparison

ANCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, less than GFFFX's 9.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANCFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A
7.43%8.54%8.90%5.80%4.98%10.97%2.61%6.91%9.31%7.28%4.71%6.08%
GFFFX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America
9.94%10.95%9.23%7.64%4.32%8.42%4.51%7.38%12.29%7.27%6.87%9.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, ANCFX and GFFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANCFX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to GFFFX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANCFX dropped -53.29% vs GFFFX's -36.26%.

ANCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANCFX and GFFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer