ANBIX vs. TRBFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ANBIX (AB Bond Inflation Strategy) and TRBFX (T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, ANBIX returned 3.43%/yr vs 2.85%/yr for TRBFX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ANBIX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for TRBFX.

Performance

ANBIX vs. TRBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANBIX achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly lower than TRBFX's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ANBIX has outperformed TRBFX with an annualized return of 3.43%, while TRBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.85% annualized return.

ANBIX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.04%
• 6M: 0.54%
• YTD: 1.03%
• 1Y: 2.11%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: 1.76%
• 10Y*: 3.43%
• ALL TIME*: 3.31%

TRBFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.77%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 1Y: 2.57%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: 2.15%
• 10Y*: 2.85%
• ALL TIME*: 2.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TRBFX T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ANBIX vs. TRBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy	1.03%	7.52%	3.20%	5.20%	-8.50%	6.35%	9.35%	9.29%	-0.76%	2.93%
TRBFX T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund	1.30%	6.34%	4.75%	3.01%	-5.19%	5.77%	5.65%	6.53%	0.28%	0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ANBIX and TRBFX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2015	0.71

The correlation between ANBIX and TRBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ANBIX vs. TRBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ANBIX

ANBIX Risk / Return Rank: 48
ANBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
ANBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ANBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
ANBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ANBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

TRBFX

TRBFX Risk / Return Rank: 21
TRBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
TRBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
TRBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
TRBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TRBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ANBIX vs. TRBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ANBIX	TRBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	0.59	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	0.88	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.23	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	0.86	+1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.89	1.61	+5.27

ANBIX vs. TRBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the TRBFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANBIX and TRBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ANBIX vs. TRBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANBIX drawdown since its inception was -11.56%, which is greater than TRBFX's maximum drawdown of -7.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANBIX and TRBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANBIX	TRBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.56%	-7.33%	-4.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.05%	-3.48%	+2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.51%	-3.51%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.85%	-7.33%	-3.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.56%	-7.33%	-4.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-1.80%	+1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-1.43%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	1.83%	-1.47%

Volatility

ANBIX vs. TRBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) is 0.50%, while T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) has a volatility of 0.61%. This indicates that ANBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANBIX	TRBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.50%	0.61%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.65%	1.85%	-0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11%	5.11%	-3.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.48%	5.16%	-0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.00%	4.02%	-0.02%

ANBIX vs. TRBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANBIX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBFX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

ANBIX vs. TRBFX - Dividend Comparison

ANBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, more than TRBFX's 4.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy	4.78%	4.93%	3.86%	4.55%	6.47%	4.70%	2.22%	3.19%	3.39%	2.05%	2.13%	1.61%
TRBFX T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund	4.67%	4.95%	4.62%	3.64%	6.11%	4.99%	1.38%	3.27%	2.34%	1.61%	1.10%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANBIX and TRBFX in my portfolio?

ANBIX and TRBFX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ANBIX or TRBFX?

TRBFX has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to ANBIX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANBIX dropped -11.56% vs TRBFX's -7.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.