PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANBIX vs. APGYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANBIX vs. APGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANBIX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than APGYX's 4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, ANBIX has underperformed APGYX with an annualized return of 3.64%, while APGYX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.50% annualized return.


ANBIX

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.08%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.58%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*
3.64%

APGYX

1D
-0.85%
1M
2.49%
YTD
4.80%
6M
3.88%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
16.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANBIX vs. APGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ANBIX
AB Bond Inflation Strategy
1.58%7.52%3.20%5.20%-8.50%6.35%9.35%9.29%-0.76%2.93%
APGYX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class
4.80%13.25%25.40%35.01%-28.78%28.92%34.38%34.13%2.22%31.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ANBIX and APGYX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2010

-0.01

The correlation between ANBIX and APGYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANBIX vs. APGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANBIX
ANBIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ANBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ANBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

APGYX
APGYX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
APGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
APGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
APGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
APGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANBIX vs. APGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANBIXAPGYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.20

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

1.02

+3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.38

3.80

+12.58

ANBIX vs. APGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANBIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the APGYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANBIX and APGYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANBIXAPGYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.09

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.55

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.84

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.49

+0.37

Drawdowns

ANBIX vs. APGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANBIX drawdown since its inception was -11.56%, smaller than the maximum APGYX drawdown of -66.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANBIX and APGYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANBIXAPGYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.56%

-66.33%

+54.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.05%

-15.24%

+14.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.52%

-21.59%

+19.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.85%

-33.91%

+23.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.56%

-33.91%

+22.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-1.47%

+1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-21.00%

+18.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

4.10%

-3.82%

Volatility

ANBIX vs. APGYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) is 0.60%, while AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class (APGYX) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that ANBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANBIXAPGYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.60%

3.31%

-2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.44%

10.94%

-9.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10%

14.38%

-12.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.49%

20.16%

-15.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.00%

19.67%

-15.67%

ANBIX vs. APGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ANBIX and APGYX have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

ANBIX vs. APGYX - Dividend Comparison

ANBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, less than APGYX's 9.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANBIX
AB Bond Inflation Strategy
4.27%4.93%3.86%4.55%6.47%4.70%2.22%3.19%3.39%2.05%2.13%1.61%
APGYX
AB Large Cap Growth Fund Advisor Class
9.31%9.76%6.58%1.65%0.86%7.17%2.59%3.43%9.08%3.77%2.67%8.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


ANBIX and APGYX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APGYX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to ANBIX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANBIX dropped -11.56% vs APGYX's -66.33%.

ANBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANBIX and APGYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer