ANAZX vs. APGZX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX).
ANAZX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Oct 15, 2013. APGZX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 1, 2015.
Performance
ANAZX vs. APGZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ANAZX vs. APGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANAZX AB Global Bond Fund Class Z | -0.85% | 6.42% | 2.70% | 5.99% | -12.17% | -2.14% | 5.13% | 7.84% | 0.38% | 3.18% |
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z | -9.67% | 13.26% | 25.47% | 35.12% | -28.74% | 29.00% | 34.47% | 34.24% | 2.30% | 31.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANAZX achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly higher than APGZX's -9.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ANAZX has underperformed APGZX with an annualized return of 1.75%, while APGZX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.92% annualized return.
ANAZX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- YTD
- -0.85%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 2.70%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
APGZX
- 1D
- 3.54%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- -9.67%
- 6M
- -9.63%
- 1Y
- 10.96%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ANAZX vs. APGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ANAZX and APGZX have an expense ratio of 0.52%.
Return for Risk
ANAZX vs. APGZX — Risk / Return Rank
ANAZX
APGZX
ANAZX vs. APGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANAZX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.58 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 0.99 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.14 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 0.77 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.88 | 2.96 | +1.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANAZX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.58 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.46 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.76 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.75 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between ANAZX and APGZX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ANAZX vs. APGZX - Dividend Comparison
ANAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, less than APGZX's 10.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANAZX AB Global Bond Fund Class Z | 3.73% | 4.89% | 3.67% | 2.53% | 8.39% | 2.73% | 2.64% | 3.71% | 3.17% | 2.53% | 3.27% | 4.06% |
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z | 10.81% | 9.77% | 6.62% | 1.69% | 0.87% | 7.19% | 2.60% | 3.49% | 9.11% | 3.78% | 2.72% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ANAZX vs. APGZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANAZX drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, smaller than the maximum APGZX drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAZX and APGZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANAZX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.24% | -33.87% | +16.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.13% | -15.21% | +12.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.24% | -33.87% | +16.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.24% | -33.87% | +16.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -12.21% | +9.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.42% | -6.08% | +2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 3.97% | -3.20% |
Volatility
ANAZX vs. APGZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) is 1.49%, while AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that ANAZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ANAZX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 6.50% | -5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.18% | 11.37% | -9.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.43% | 20.18% | -16.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 20.18% | -15.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.72% | 19.63% | -15.91% |