ANAZX vs. APGZX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ANAZX (AB Global Bond Fund Class Z) and APGZX (AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z) are both mutual funds - ANAZX is a Global Bonds fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while APGZX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 10 years, ANAZX returned 1.75%/yr vs 16.58%/yr for APGZX. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.52% expense ratio.

Performance

ANAZX vs. APGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANAZX achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than APGZX's 4.85% return. Over the past 10 years, ANAZX has underperformed APGZX with an annualized return of 1.75%, while APGZX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.58% annualized return.

ANAZX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 0.58%
• 6M: 0.77%
• 1Y: 3.21%
• 3Y*: 4.69%
• 5Y*: 0.35%
• 10Y*: 1.75%

APGZX

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 2.50%
• YTD: 4.85%
• 6M: 3.93%
• 1Y: 14.65%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 11.05%
• 10Y*: 16.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANAZX vs. APGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ANAZX AB Global Bond Fund Class Z	0.58%	6.42%	2.70%	5.99%	-12.17%	-2.14%	5.13%	7.84%	0.38%	3.18%
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z	4.85%	13.26%	25.47%	35.12%	-28.74%	29.00%	34.47%	34.24%	2.30%	31.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ANAZX and APGZX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.09

Over the past year, ANAZX and APGZX have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

ANAZX vs. APGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANAZX

ANAZX Risk / Return Rank: 14
ANAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ANAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ANAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
ANAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ANAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

APGZX

APGZX Risk / Return Rank: 14
APGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
APGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
APGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
APGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
APGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANAZX vs. APGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ANAZX	APGZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.09	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.58	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.20	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	1.03	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.63	3.82	-0.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ANAZX vs. APGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANAZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the APGZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANAZX and APGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ANAZX	APGZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	1.09	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.55	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.85	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.82	-0.15

Drawdowns

ANAZX vs. APGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANAZX drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, smaller than the maximum APGZX drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAZX and APGZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ANAZX	APGZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.24%	-33.87%	+16.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.12%	-15.21%	+12.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.00%	-21.57%	+17.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.24%	-33.87%	+16.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.24%	-33.87%	+16.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-1.47%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.39%	-6.02%	+2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	4.09%	-3.12%

Volatility

ANAZX vs. APGZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Global Bond Fund Class Z (ANAZX) is 1.45%, while AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that ANAZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ANAZX	APGZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.45%	3.32%	-1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.80%	10.93%	-8.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.34%	14.37%	-11.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.46%	20.15%	-15.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.77%	19.67%	-15.90%

ANAZX vs. APGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ANAZX and APGZX have an expense ratio of 0.52%.

Dividends

ANAZX vs. APGZX - Dividend Comparison

ANAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than APGZX's 9.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANAZX AB Global Bond Fund Class Z	3.76%	4.89%	3.67%	2.53%	8.39%	2.73%	2.64%	3.71%	3.17%	2.53%	3.27%	4.06%
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z	9.31%	9.77%	6.62%	1.69%	0.87%	7.19%	2.60%	3.49%	9.11%	3.78%	2.72%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ANAZX and APGZX in my portfolio?

ANAZX and APGZX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ANAZX or APGZX?

APGZX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to ANAZX (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ANAZX dropped -17.24% vs APGZX's -33.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.