ANAU.DE vs. QTOP
ANAU.DE (AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - ANAU.DE tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while QTOP tracks the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ANAU.DE returned 39.48% vs 38.70% for QTOP. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ANAU.DE charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QTOP.
Performance
ANAU.DE vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ANAU.DE achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly higher than QTOP's 15.63% return.
ANAU.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 6.81%
- YTD
- 19.26%
- 6M
- 18.67%
- 1Y
- 39.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTOP
- 1D
- -5.08%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 15.63%
- 6M
- 14.39%
- 1Y
- 38.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANAU.DE vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ANAU.DE AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 19.26% | 20.55% | 5.41% |
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 15.63% | 22.19% | 5.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between ANAU.DE and QTOP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024 | 0.65 |
The correlation between ANAU.DE and QTOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ANAU.DE vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank
ANAU.DE
QTOP
ANAU.DE vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ANAU.DE | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.37 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.71 | 3.02 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.31 | 11.05 | +2.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ANAU.DE | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | 2.14 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 1.24 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
ANAU.DE vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ANAU.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, roughly equal to the maximum QTOP drawdown of -23.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAU.DE and QTOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ANAU.DE | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.35% | -23.28% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -12.88% | +2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -5.97% | +5.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -3.81% | +0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 3.51% | -0.47% |
Volatility
ANAU.DE vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) is 4.75%, while iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that ANAU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ANAU.DE | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 7.28% | -2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 14.48% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.96% | 18.18% | -2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 23.02% | -4.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 23.02% | -4.62% |
ANAU.DE vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ANAU.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ANAU.DE vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison
ANAU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ANAU.DE AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ANAU.DE and QTOP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANAU.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANAU.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QTOP.
ANAU.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. They also come from different issuers: AXA IM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for ANAU.DE and 0.20% for QTOP.
Find the right allocation for ANAU.DE and QTOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer