PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ANAU.DE vs. IUIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ANAU.DE vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ANAU.DE achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 23.04% return.


ANAU.DE

1D
-0.69%
1M
6.81%
YTD
19.26%
6M
18.67%
1Y
39.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IUIT.L

1D
-2.11%
1M
10.65%
YTD
23.04%
6M
22.40%
1Y
50.55%
3Y*
34.42%
5Y*
24.18%
10Y*
26.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ANAU.DE vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ANAU.DE
AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc
19.26%20.55%26.51%13.09%
IUIT.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
23.04%22.93%38.51%13.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ANAU.DE and IUIT.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023

0.90

The correlation between ANAU.DE and IUIT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ANAU.DE vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ANAU.DE
ANAU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ANAU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

IUIT.L
IUIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ANAU.DE vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ANAU.DEIUIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

3.03

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.31

8.99

+4.32

ANAU.DE vs. IUIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ANAU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the IUIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ANAU.DE and IUIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ANAU.DEIUIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.55

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

1.16

+0.44

Drawdowns

ANAU.DE vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ANAU.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, smaller than the maximum IUIT.L drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ANAU.DE and IUIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ANAU.DEIUIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.35%

-33.46%

+11.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.88%

-17.03%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-3.14%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-6.02%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

5.76%

-2.72%

Volatility

ANAU.DE vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AXA IM NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF - USD Acc (ANAU.DE) is 4.75%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that ANAU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ANAU.DEIUIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

7.49%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.91%

15.53%

-3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.96%

20.28%

-4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.40%

23.61%

-5.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.40%

22.47%

-4.07%

ANAU.DE vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ANAU.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ANAU.DE vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ANAU.DE nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ANAU.DE and IUIT.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ANAU.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANAU.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IUIT.L.

ANAU.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. ANAU.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: AXA IM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for ANAU.DE and 0.15% for IUIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ANAU.DE and IUIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer