AMZZ vs. PTIR
AMZZ (GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZZ returned 25.28% vs -21.52% for PTIR. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.
Performance
AMZZ vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZZ achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -46.20% return.
AMZZ
- 1D
- -5.02%
- 1M
- -16.12%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 25.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTIR
- 1D
- -13.01%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- YTD
- -46.20%
- 6M
- -46.23%
- 1Y
- -21.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZZ vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF | 9.44% | -8.94% | 52.45% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -46.20% | 221.36% | 425.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZZ and PTIR is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.40 |
AMZZ vs. PTIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZZ
PTIR
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZZ
PTIR
-
Basic Materials
AMZZ
-
PTIR
-
Communication Services
AMZZ
-
PTIR
-
Consumer Defensive
AMZZ
-
PTIR
-
Energy
AMZZ
-
PTIR
-
Financial Services
AMZZ
-
PTIR
-
Healthcare
AMZZ
-
PTIR
-
Industrials
AMZZ
-
PTIR
-
Real Estate
AMZZ
-
PTIR
-
Technology
AMZZ
-
PTIR
Utilities
AMZZ
-
PTIR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZZ vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank
AMZZ
PTIR
AMZZ vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZZ | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.05 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | -0.32 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | -0.55 | +1.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZZ | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | -0.21 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.98 | -1.73 |
Drawdowns
AMZZ vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZZ drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum PTIR drawdown of -69.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZZ and PTIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZZ | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -69.10% | +13.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.97% | -68.11% | +26.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.02% | -62.92% | +44.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.21% | -27.47% | +7.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.49% | 39.55% | -21.06% |
Volatility
AMZZ vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) is 14.66%, while GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a volatility of 36.75%. This indicates that AMZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZZ | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.66% | 36.75% | -22.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.44% | 77.20% | -36.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.66% | 103.10% | -43.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.82% | 129.58% | -66.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.82% | 129.58% | -66.76% |
AMZZ vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMZZ and PTIR have an expense ratio of 1.15%.
Dividends
AMZZ vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison
AMZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 10.80% | 5.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZZ and PTIR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIR has higher volatility (36.75%) compared to AMZZ (14.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZZ dropped -55.28% vs PTIR's -69.10%.
On 1-year performance, AMZZ leads with 25.28% vs -21.52% for PTIR. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, AMZZ has been the lower-risk option at 14.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AMZZ has performed better with a 25.28% return vs -21.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AMZZ and PTIR have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.
PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 10.80%, compared with 0.00% for AMZZ.
AMZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZZ and PTIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer