AMZZ vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMZZ (GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZZ returned 25.28% vs 6074.28% for MULL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZZ charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

AMZZ vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZZ achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.

AMZZ

• 1D: -5.02%
• 1M: -16.12%
• YTD: 9.44%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: 25.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 216.81%
• YTD: 936.86%
• 6M: 1,369.93%
• 1Y: 6,074.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZZ vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF	9.44%	-8.94%	7.90%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	936.86%	558.51%	-40.10%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZZ and MULL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	0.39

AMZZ vs. MULL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMZZ	MULL
Consumer Cyclical	66.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	66.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMZZ vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZZ

AMZZ Risk / Return Rank: 17
AMZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
AMZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
AMZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 19
AMZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
AMZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 15

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZZ vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMZZ	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.43	46.71	-46.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	7.02	-6.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.89	-0.77
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	116.34	-115.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.37	390.40	-389.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMZZ vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 46.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZZ and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZZ	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43	46.71	-46.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	7.45	-7.20

Drawdowns

AMZZ vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZZ drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZZ and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZZ	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.28%	-72.29%	+17.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.97%	-53.09%	+11.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.02%	0.00%	-18.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.21%	-20.62%	+0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.49%	15.79%	+2.70%

Volatility

AMZZ vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) is 14.66%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that AMZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZZ	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.66%	55.41%	-40.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.44%	105.59%	-65.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.66%	132.38%	-72.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.82%	136.22%	-73.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.82%	136.22%	-73.40%

AMZZ vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZZ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZZ vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

AMZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZZ and MULL in my portfolio?

AMZZ and MULL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZZ or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to AMZZ (14.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZZ dropped -55.28% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, AMZZ or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs 25.28% for AMZZ. On fees, AMZZ is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, AMZZ has been the lower-risk option at 14.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZZ or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs 25.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZZ or MULL?

AMZZ is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZZ or MULL?

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for AMZZ.

What is the main difference between AMZZ and MULL?

Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AMZZ and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.